Patient dozens

[hermes]

Don't wait till 3 dozens or columns come! Do the strategy after 2 D/C and you increase your wins rapidly. I do it for years as a filler for other betting systems. If double dozen or column comes bet the opposite 2, if loss wait for next double trigger.
To increase betting chance you can ad double streets: A 1-4, B 2-5, C 3-6.
Hermes

[hermes]

ALSO WE COULD TRY...
===============================================================
*there are 27 formations for groups of 3 consecutive dozens/columns
so there are 9 groups "matrix style" starting with each one


example dozzen 3


311
312
313
321
322
323
331
332
333


so we can try instead of hitting the sleeper, bet that it will sleep one more time.


You can even bet next row that the last spin will not repeat. Example:
321
32? bet 2/3 against the 1 D/C. If lost wait for end of the next row.
Hermes

[psiho2209]

Thanks Hermes, also good aproach.

Regards

[hermes]

With slow progression you can never lose with the double D/C strategy. There will be small downdrafts from time to time but you come always on the end as a winner. I know it from long experience. This is one of my strategies I am not afraid of losing the game.
Hermes

[albertojonas]

ALSO WE COULD TRY...
===============================================================
*there are 27 formations for groups of 3 consecutive dozens/columns
so there are 9 groups "matrix style" starting with each one


example dozzen 3


311
312
313
321
322
323
331
332
333


so we can try instead of hitting the sleeper, bet that it will sleep one more time.


You can even bet next row that the last spin will not repeat. Example:
321
32? bet 2/3 against the 1 D/C. If lost wait for end of the next row.
Hermes

and that is exactly what is being done.
we have a strange bond Hermes. ;-)

[hermes]

At online casinos with low bankroll you can use this progression:
on 0    on D/C   bankroll   win D  win 0
0.1      0.5/0.5    1.1            0.4      2.5
0.2      1.5/1.5    4.3            0.2      2.9
0.6         5/5      14.9           0.1      6.7
2          20/20    56.9          3.1      15.1

In average XX comes in 6,8 spins and XXX comes in 20 spins once. Easy math what to do.
Hermes

[albertojonas]

No, its because you don't know what you are talking about and you cant answer me.You obviously don't know the meaning of Advantage play. You have made your self look quite stupid in the last TWO posts.

Advantage play is not a method, it means you have a type of advantage to overcome the house edge.

Advantage play is a method Yes YES YES YES.
and YES it means a method you believe overcomes house edge. And the man didn't say method. he said WAY. WAY.

I repeat it because it seems you have some kind of difficulty sight reading it.

tell me you are one of those who bought a roulette computer...

Why don't you stay away if it doesn't interest you?

Want to contribute with something despite saying we are stupid and it does not work?

I smell frustration.

Be fair and polite if you can.

[insidebet]

Albertojonas,

Think about it  for two seconds...
After 150 years of research by millions of people, the answer is "wait for a dozen to repeat three times, and then bet gainst it with a progression".  And you can honnestly say this is not silly?

This beginners stuff.  We all, and I mean al, go through that phase.

I am just being realistic here, not negative.

Insider

[hermes]

Insidebet why don't you observe 5000 spins of dozens and columns. After that you will change your mind, I guarantee you. You people are looking for very complicated strategies and systems and the roulette and other games are so simple. Most of the time we even don't see the tip of our nose because we are busy with the distant.
I don't care what did impotent researchers for 150 years, what I know that they wasted their time.
Not heavy negative thinking but sharp observation of the game will improve the angle of seeing it. The old Chinese made the significant discoveries through the observation of the things.
Be a good and patient observer and the key to holy grail will appears. Edison failed 10.000 times before it started to glow in his bulb! Want something badly enough and it will realize itself.
Hermes

[Antibet]

insider, I'm still waiting for you to offer some positive input. I dare say you're as peeeved as we all are that these systems don't work, what do you suggest? We all know so what do YOU think, i rest your case...!

[albertojonas]

it is not a question wether it is a newbie system or not. It's the dissenting arrogant posture some members take.
Let people share and make their own path.

Good Luck

[RobbieD]

I think it should be a prerequisite that on any method it should be noted whether a system is for a live wheel or RNG.

RNG is software. Therefore it can be manipulated. It is not true roulette. It is is not true RNG.

On RNG Playtech doing free spins I can achieve numerous blocks of black or red - I had 25 reds yesterday on free spins - however, using my bet of following reds and blacks, i.e. if a red appears bet on red, if a black appears, bet on black, multiple blocks of a colour suddenly disappear and the zig-zags suddenly appear (red black red black red black, etc) and usually the highest blocks of colours are about 5 or 6. Zig-zags kill the betting.

Exactly the same with dozens. Betting against a certain dozen, I have had that dozen hit 12 times. Yet when I use a similar bet to the above, i.e. if the first dozen hits I bet on that dozen, the 2nd dozen hits, I bet on that, etc., the occurrence of multiple dozens decreases dramatically.

Paranoid? Perhaps. Proveable? No.

Unless a Playtech employee comes on this Forum to spill the beans, you will never be able to prove that Playtech adjusts their software according to your betting patterns.

I liken Playtech to UK politicians and Rupert Murdoch. They are all money-grabbing manipulative bastards.

So, I think if you have a system, you must say if it's for a live wheel or RNG - if it's for the latter I can categorically state now that it will not work.

You have been warned. Online RNG is not true random. And I bet if the likes of Wiliiam Hill and Europa read these forums they are smiling from ear to ear........

[mr green]

Your all right

Outsidebet has a point and hermes is bang on in my view, but thats just me I like simple. 

You cant beat roulette, but you can win at roulette. 

It will never be beaten because of -2.7 its impossible to win forever with a system and never lose.

What these simple ways do is give you an idea of the patterns, so in play you can make decisions based upon what you believe will happen, even pros have bad days but will make up for it on another.

The reason people like these systems is because of the low bank needed to fund them, to play on strait up numbers you need to have large bank or be very lucky just betting on two or three numbers.

Someone so clever should think of their own systems, and see how clever they really are. lol

xx


     
       

[insidebet]

Hermes,

If I get your point right, you are saying "observe and go with your gut feeling".  No set rules.  Right?  Maybe so, but I am yet to see anyone win with theit gut feelings.  To me it is all down to luck if you play like this.  But what do I know! Sweet f all I guess...

I am one of the very few here to have made a decent amount of cash with this game.  I already said how.  And for the Xth time, I will not mention it again.

Now I also suggested a few different  methods with a possible positive expectation outcome.  Not much interest albeit a few private messages from a few people.  The rest  were too busy "waiting for three of the same dozen and betting the opposite".

Insider

[insidebet]

One more thing.
What my "gut feeling" tells me is that, if there is a winning way, it has something to do with the physical side of the wheel itself.  Not in any way with the table bet layout.
So one must concentrate with sectors, big or small, the dealer spinning the ball, wheels biases, etc. etc.

But don t listen to any of that.  I am just a negative loser that don t know anything.

Insider

[insidebet]

-