Interesting point from the Wiz site

[Mr J]

Was real busy, sorry. Listen guys, I am repeating myself.......If the AP crew want to continue doing what they claim to do, I DON'T CARE, HONESTLY. Start MANY AP threads at this board, have a blast, you'll get ZERO insults from me  on YOUR threads. My biggest complaint has been the same for years.

A) I have to prove something while you do not. Just because your 'style' of play is GREAT in theory does NOT mean you actually do it. Its funny....if I say I do 'good' at this game, I hear that I have to prove it. If the AP crew say they do 'good' at this game and I say BS, I have to disprove them wrong. 

B) Definitions: Over time, I have noticed that the definitions of certain things (words) are far different from the AP crew and method guys. I INSIST in fairness, same rules/definitions for everyone.

Those are kind of my biggest sticking points, NOTHING MORE than that. Is it a huge deal? Heck no, I'm not losing sleep over it and I do *NOT* want to argue about it. As for Kelly.......he is one of maybe 3 AP guys I can tolerate. He is the ONLY AP guy I would love to have a couple beers, have a lunch with him and shoot the breeze with him regarding AP and roulette in general.

Ken

[Mr J]

"I am intrigued by the observation you have stated.  I agree, why is that? I think each group are in denial.  The fact of the matter is past numbers is just that, past numbers" >>> I agree Kimo Li.

Ok, it might be debatable if past numbers are useful or not, however, I think its a slam dunk saying that both crews to SOME DEGREE (even if small) use past numbers. I am not saying the past 400 numbers, lets clear that up.

Ken

[Mr J]

-