Some pepole are just to much and to senstive at myrulet LOL

[I have cookies]

I post a reply to some one that its more effective using defect spotting and also mention you can use another method with out defect spotting to find a true valid situation - is just take a littel more effort and time.
Now then I mention that Kelly and Snowman just post hints and elaborate in general about bias and that there is not so much to find in the public arena about bias.

Then this dramaqueen start to remove the word defect spotting witch also existis at many, many other places at myrulet.
I believe just mention does words would lead pepole to get a gold mine or its so sensitive information that he had to remove does words from my post.

I just have to say I talk to many AP and never has I meet such ridiculous reaction before.
I assume there idiots in both camps in the AP communite and among roulette system players.

[Mr J]

"then I mention that Kelly and Snowman just post hints and elaborate in general about bias" >>> Those are not hints, trust me. They have nothing to offer. Did they want a 21 gun salute as well? 

Ken

[Kelly]

And what have you got to offer ken, in your other thread you describe how to track a tilted wheel through numbers ?!?!!! and that there is a difference in the profit when playing sleepers and hot numbers.

Both issues is directly wrong and belongs  in the joke section.  The sad part is that you were serious when you posted it.  The first issue is simply because you dont know and the second issue is because you have never testet enough sessions (if any at all) to show the real figures.

As for the myrulet thing, i dont know what the issue is there, i havent been following lately.  I have promised not to give detailed info from snows script, so i can only speak in general on bias. 

[Mr J]

What I offer? At least I explain WHAT and WHY I bet a certain way.......no secrets with me. Granted, you dont have to agree with my 800 threads but I lay everything out in the open. My s**t can be tested (good or bad results), with the AP crew, its all based on TAKING THEIR WORD.

Ken

[Kelly]

15 years ago i was in the system player camp too, i got more than 3000 written pages and +200 long term tested systems as background for picking the opposit camp, the AP camp. No you dont have to take an APs word, everything can be tested physichly and mathematicly the same way as with system plays.  All you need to do is to get a grip on how things work before you start.

But that will be the day.

[Mr J]

I forgot you had a history of method play. Let me ask this......what TYPE of method do you like? Something of your own or something from another poster? Dont worry, if you dont like to talk about methods IN THE OPEN, you can always PM/email me. It'll be our secret, I won't say a word.

Ken

[Kelly]

I played a variation of this nolinks://nolinks.paroli.de/unverlierbare-progression-02.html a long time ago.  But got my common sense back before it was too late. Apart from that, I have played just about what there is to play and I never found anything I really fancyed before I hit the AP methods.

+11000 units in 308 spins with 62 units bankroll.
nolinks://nolinks.paroli.de/casino/unverlierbare-progression.htm

[Mr J]

Thanks for the reply!

Ken

[I have cookies]

Well it boils down to one simple thing as I would never write about details or mention sensitive things - but using the word defect spotting - just mention the word does not mean its sensitive or reveal any thing from written book or from any other source.
Its the second time some one assume and mention hes book - just because I mention the word defect spotting.
When I had my dialog with LS about bias we sure use that word as its boils down to be more effective.
Toward to the situation at my roulette I just try to mention it opposite towards other ways to calibrate and find a wheel being bias.
And should add it just take some more effort and time - but as I understand this also rare and not common knowledge.
So I assume I just should stop mention it as it will only lead to misunderstanding.

[I have cookies]

-