Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

UNIQUE

Started by Norman Bates, July 18, 2011, 12:29:11 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Norman Bates

2 units on numbers 8, 29, the1st dozen, 3rd dozen, column A, column C

4 units on the 11/14, 16/19, 18/21, and 23/26 split

5 units on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33

6 units on numbers 0, and 00

11 units on numbers 17, and 20

82 units of 4

2 units on numbers 8, 29,



4 units on 11/14, 16/19, 18/21, and 23/26 split

5 units on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33

6 units on the 1st dozen, 3rd dozen, column A, and column C

8 units on 0, 00, 17, and 20

96 units of 4

1 unit on 17/20 split

2 units on numbers 8, 29, 0, 00, column A, and column C

4 units on numbers 17, 20, 11/14, 16/19, 18/21, and 23/26 split

5 units on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33

9 units on the 2nd dozen

66 units of 4

1 unit on numbers 2 ,8, 29, 35, the 2nd dozen, column B,(it isn't a typo) and  0/00, 17/20 split

4 units on  11/14, 16/19, 18/21,and 23/26 split

5 units on numbers 4, 6, 17, 20, 31, 33, the 1st dozen, 3rd dozen, column A, and column C (it's sill not a typo)

9 units on numbers 0, and 00

92 units of 4

1 unit on numbers 17/20 split

5 chips on number 0/00

2 units on numbers 8, 29, 0, and 00

4 units on 17, 20, 11/14, 16/19, 18/21, and 23/26 split

5 units on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33

6 units on the 2nd dozen, and column B

66 units of 4 with 1 extra chip (not 1 unit) on 0/00


ADulay


Norman Bates

It's just an idea ADulay.
It's So people can have a flat bet placement that's easy use for the laymen when Playing a online casinos that's y. This is the brainstorming section is it not?  AND , I'm not here to continue on making you more, and more bet placements for your own personal gain, then complaining when they don't work. If you want to know why, check out my blow by blow in the, "frame work session" under million dollar computation strategy so y9ou no longer have to act confused about how it's supposed to work, AND  Trust me ADulay we've been over this before, I will no longer respond to any more of your rude complements, or anything else that you have to say... Once again, We've been over this before, AND it's not constructive criticism by u, it's a witch hunt being mounted by you and your constituency to wrangle me out of my right to post ideas in this forum.  So good luck with that.  If you even have a strategy of your own, you wouldn't have to complain about mine right?  I've nothing else to say to you.

insidebet

Mr. Bates,

Anytime someone asks "why" you, and an awful lot of posters like you, go balistic.  "You bunch of negative people don t have anything at all and keep complaining", bla-bla-bla."

What you don t understand is that for a system/method to work and win after a million spin (i don t know that you have something that wins flat bet after that many spins), there has to be A REASON WHY THIS METHOD COULD WORK.
Just saying "Try this. It might make you a lot of money" is not enough to be serious.  If there is no reason, then you just rely on luck.  What is so complicated about that?

What you just posted here is just nonsense.  You could be blindfolded and drop a bunch of chips on the layout, and you will have the same result on the long run.

And please don t reply "so smart ass, where is YOUR idea about winning".  I have replied to that so many times, prety fed up by now.

Insidebet

Norman Bates

It wasn't a million spins, it was 1.5 million chips smarty pants

ADulay

Norm, Old Buddy...

  We've been over this many times before, both here and in the other forums that still allow you to post up.

  Although the "designer" system/wagers that you bring here are beautiful to look at on the table (perfectly symmetrical every time), they are just pointless and mostly unplayable in ANY casino environment.

  I've said it before, I have no animosity towards you, I'm just making the comment that others have decided to just blow on by.  There can be no real discussion of what you've posted as it makes no sense at all, especially on a roulette table!

  Believe me, I actually have put every single one of your "ideas" through 100's of thousand's of spins under RX and invariably they just crash and burn horribly!   Not just lose, they crater big time.  EVERY ONE OF THEM.

  This would be why you rarely see anyone comment on your postings.  It's just too wrong on so many levels.

  There is always too  much money on the table and usually there are only two spots that would actually show a profit if they hit, rendering all of the other wagers totally pointless!

  If every single number on the board loses money and only the zero (with 22 units on it) shows a profit, why have any of the other wagers? 

  This is THE hallmark of your system ideas!

  So, please take my comments on your ideas for what they are worth.   I read your posts, I test them and have reported back numerous time, some even with graphs.   And still you insist I'm trying to attack you or something.

  If anyone else would comment on these ideas I could easily just leave them alone and they could deal with it but nobody ever comments.  There is a reason for this attitude from the membership!!

  AD

insidebet

Quote from: Norman Bates on July 19, 2011, 04:01:40 PM
It wasn't a million spins, it was 1.5 million chips smarty pants

So what about those 1.5 millions chips?

insidebet

-