Contacting Gizmotron

[ReDsQuaD]

Gizmo has bigger fish to fry!

[attachimg=#]

There is a slight tilt in this one. Maybe some kind of dealers signature?   

Gizmo does not rely on whee bias etc. He looks for exploitable trends.

[mr.ore]

Explitable trends = if you are lucky and it's hitting, then you have an advantage of course, but it's a "luck induced advantage". It's hard to chase the dragon...

I should rather really "chase the dragon" than play roulette, maybe I would get more benefits from that, LoL

[xman1970]

Do you see Steves name in my Sig?

Does he OWN the websites in your sig 

[ReDsQuaD]

Does he OWN the websites in your sig 

Oh i get it. So that makes me obbsed with steve by putting he's website in my sig? That's just ridiculus.

My intention is to express that roulette is beatable. The point is Genuine Winner is the only real way to beat roulette - Hence the link in my sig.

[iggiv]

about "the only way to beat roulette". it is like saying Milky Way is the only way in the space.

[ReDsQuaD]

I can't be sure but I think if he
really beat the roulette he would be here claiming his victory. My guess is he left because he gave up.

But why should he go round braging on forums that he rinses the casino? That's unproessional - Most AP's don't tell a thing.

[John Gold]

I don't see how Gizmotron could have had much success teaching others. The problem does not just rest with the teacher either. A lot of guys have studied roulette for 6 months and then start making assumptions.

1) you can only win flat betting.
2) The method can't be subjective.

Talk about putting barriers in the way before you even begin.

It is accepted by a few of the more senior players that you need to mix things up a bit and have a few tricks in your bag. This does not sit well with someone who wants proof something works in a mechanical fashion. Well roulette does not work like that. I can imagine after reading Gizmotron's posts that he he is a very intuitive player. You can't test that over a million spins on RX but you can't proof either that Gizmotron does not make it work for him.

[ReDsQuaD]

Gizmo's account has not been deleted : nolinks://vlsroulette.com/index.php?action=profile;u=2000

[Nathan Detroit]

********It is accepted by a few of the more senior players that you need to mix things up a bit and have a few tricks in your bag. This does not sit well with someone who wants proof something works in a mechanical fashion. Well roulette does not work like that. I can imagine after reading Gizmotron's posts that he he is a very intuitive player. You can't test that over a million spins on RX but you can't proof either that Gizmotron does not make it work for him.********John Gold

All kidding aside I agree with John Gold`s  assesment of Gizmo`s  attempts to beat roulette >>>>>>HIS WAY.


Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Nathan Detroit]

If  a winning personal method cannot be tested it drives  some posters up the wall .
N.D.

[Nathan Detroit]

-