Misfit

[Norman Bates]

1. all right.  I will answer your question to the best of my knowledge ken. Its getting kinda personal but what the h**L.  I drank and gambled until my disease got the better of me.  

2. handicap people have rights too.  We can have a drivers license, and enjoy the same thing everybody else is entitled to.  Drinking on the other hand is legal, but would  be deadly in my case.

3.  My basis for this strategy/or bet placement is accomplished by adding up how many units of 5 are listed in each quadrant.  A quadrant is 3, 6, 9,  and 12 for instance.  First, I had to make a compensation strategy that was divisible by 5 in both the columns, dozens, and inside bets of the inside and outside bets as I've explained many times before.  

4. Then I added up the number of units that were in each "quadrant".  they came out to be a mix and match set of numbers so I evened them out buy borrowing from one quadrant, and adding it onto another.  That didn't work out so well so I just decided to borrow 2 units from the 14, 17, 20, and 23 quadrant, and use them on the o's and discarded 2 more leaving only 9 working units in that quadrant. That's why I called it "Reverse", Because I dropped units instead of adding more.  In effect I "threw it in Reverse."

5. In layman's terms I just used a standard compensation strategy, dropped 2 units from the center of the table, and put them on on 0/00 split. Then I dropped 2 more units, and didn't replace them any ware on the layout.  Why it works?  I don't know, but when it stops, I'm going to take another Stab at the whole unified quadrant routine.  That's my latest line of thinking in all of this mess.

[Steve]

Norman, I'm sorry you are going about roulette all wrong. I can appreciate you are trying to share, but your approaches have a lot of problems.

[Mr J]

"Why it works?  I don't know" >>> I didn't ask that and I never will. Why? I dont like it when its asked of me. I asked why you chose that TYPE of a bet....which you answered.

"handicap people have rights too.  We can have a drivers license, and enjoy the same thing everybody else is entitled to" >>> Dont ACT like I was slamming you, because I was not.

Its your 'right' to post methods here, I guess.  I have a challenge for you on your NEXT method. Post something........6 numbers max. A ceiling of 36 units per spin, all flat betting, never going over 36 units.


Ken

[Mr J]

10 chips on numbers 8, 29, the 2nd dozen, column B, 16/19, and 18/21 split
20 chips on corner (10:14), (11:15), (22:26), and (23:27)
21.5 chips on numbers 0, and 00
33 chips on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33
48 chips on numbers 17, and 20
422 chips per spin.  4,220 buy-in
Use Same Spins Each Time

"Units are increments of any given number" >>> Yes I know that, thanks.

I'll use this method as my example question. Assuming we are talking about dollar chips, you are saying that the 'buy in' for THIS method is $4,220, correct? *KNOWING* (or you should know) that MOST here will not risk or even have $4,220, why post the method?? Dont even tell me it could be 25 cent units, I'm using dollar units as the lowest example.

Ken

[Norman Bates]

Mr. J, please forget about this thread.  Please Go to the "18 spins", and the" have you seen this 1800 buy-in" threads.

[ADulay]

I've also seen many people bet a lot more money than that on a single hand of blackjack.  Craps too!  You guys don't seem to know your way around a casino very well.  I guess you guys forgot.  That's how I earned my money.  So please remember that when you say, "oh he doesn't know how to gamble".

Making a single (or a few) large table wagers is NOT the same as making 422 individual wagers.

It's not the money, it's the time available for the bet!

AD

[ADulay]

-