Misfit

[Norman Bates]

10 chips on numbers 8, 29, the 2nd dozen, column B, 16/19, and 18/21 split
20 chips on corner (10:14), (11:15), (22:26), and (23:27)
21.5 chips on numbers 0, and 00
33 chips on numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33
48 chips on numbers 17, and 20
422 chips per spin.  4,220 buy-in
Use Same Spins Each Time

[ADulay]

Simple and Reliable

Define "reliable" as it pertains to this extravaganza you've just posted here.

AD

[Norman Bates]

Very colorful ADulay, just not Risque'. I like It!

[ADulay]

Norm,

  Just changing the thread title on your message does not automatically change all of them.

  Just answer the question.

  AD

[Norman Bates]

Lets face it boys.  Roulette Xtreme is little more than a child's toy, because of the irregularity of certain bet placements on the layout, but without it, you people would  be out of a job.  So, of course you must consider me a threat.

Not only that, but this is just the brainstorming section of the forum, and yet you still seem to have the time to criticize me personally for the strategies I post. With that said, I continue on playing the game, because for some reason I still get hours of enjoyment figuring out new ways to make the meter run.  

The software has an option to repeat the same spins over, and over but you can't win using that feature so why did they put it on there in the first place?  The bet placements I have made over the past few months all worked until I posted them on the web. Then poof, just like magic, they stop working.  Even if you use the same downloadable spins as you did when you were winning they still stop working.  There for, it seems to me that someone has a vested interest in making sure you can not discover a winning solution with roulette extreme software.  It's always break, or bust with no happy medium.

I agree, you can't win forever, but it's all a little too hokey for me.   Merry X-Mas

And as for you ADulay you know I'm handicapped, so why don't you find someone else in your category to pick on?

[Steve]

Norman, it is a not a personal stab to say I cant make sense of what you post. It looks like needlessly complicated bet placement with at times aggressive progression. There is no conspiracy to make your system lose eventually. It is more like it doesnt work in the first place, and you find this with further testing.

With your general approach to roulette, it simply cannot work. Or perhaps I dont understand the logic in why you bet what you bet because to me it seems random. If you want people to respond better, I suggest explaining what you are posting.

[Mr J]

"422 chips per spin.  4,220 buy-in" >>> 

[Norman Bates]

The comment about, "don't change the title and think I won't continue to pester you about it"Thing!!!  I tried to change the title, and made a positive change  for him, but he was still argumentative.  The question was asked, and answered. There's no reason to be like that.  Also, if you don't like the buy_ in listed discuss that with me, or just use your own.  You don't have to be rude about it with that stupid smiley shooting his mouth off.  That's just rude, and Don't expect me to be perfect when you guys are trained professionals, and do nothing in the way of help. I'm trying to do good.  You guys shouldn't be all PO'd about me like that. Besides, There's something else I want you to see.  It's called,"Reverse"!

1 unit on 17/20 split
2 units on 8, 29, the 2nd dozen, column B, 0/00, 16/19, and 18/21 split
4 units on corners (10:14), (11:15), (22:26), and (23/27)
6 units of numbers 4, 6, 31, and 33
55 units of 5. 275 chips per spin.  750 chip buy-in not including the original 275 chips all ready on the layout.

[Mr J]

Not trying to be rotten but......Im not sure which is more strange. The bet selection or the number of chips required?


No person is gonna bet 422 chips PER SPIN. Do you get that?

Ken

[Norman Bates]

Once Again, Asked And Answered!

[Mr J]

Ok, I'll rephrase the question. Not counting this method........all your other methods, no sane person is gonna BET the number of chips you post (or the buy in), so why post it?

Ken

[Norman Bates]

You would think that if a reliable flat bet, good for maybe a grand or two worked, it would be very much appreciated.  Some people have money enough.  It's like saying to someone on Wall Street,"Hey man, how come you Invest so much hard earned money on Crap like that?"

I've also seen many people bet a lot more money than that on a single hand of blackjack.  Craps too!  You guys don't seem to know your way around a casino very well.  I guess you guys forgot.  That's how I earned my money.  So please remember that when you say, "oh he doesn't know how to gamble".

[Mr J]

"You guys don't seem to know your way around a casino" >>> If I remember correctly, I thought you said you dont play THESE methods (that you post) and/or even go to casinos?

Ken

[Norman Bates]

That's how I grew up ken.  my mom was a dealer, my step dad is still a craps dealer to this day ofter maybe 25 years or so.  OK?  
So, I worked in nevada casinos sinse I was 14 years old in one fassion or another.  I dealt for 10.  Now, I'm disabled living on ssd in california.
I was at a Palm Springs Casino just yesterday playing slots.  It's Called Aqua Caliente  they have roulette I just don't play.

[Mr J]

Ok, for the record, you do NOT play at a casino, correct? In some cases (not all) you can be disabled and still play.

I'll make my question a bit more clear....your methods are BASED on WHAT in regards to past experiences? I'm NOT slamming you, simply asking. I dont even care if a certain method sucks, I'm only curious, method 'XXX' is based on what?

Ken

[Mr J]

-