RSW Testing

[cps10]

Good morning All,

I have finally completed a test of over 4,000 live actual spins using this system tailored to my preferences.

First of all, I would use the generation tool that arigazzo was so nice to program. That is how I determined the prediction or BASE number. The BASE number would determine WHAT I would bet. The following table shows WHAT I would bet, based on the BASE number:

Predicted #      #1      #2      #3      #4      #5      #6      #7      #8      #9
0      0      00      1      2      3                        
1      0      00      1      2      3      4      5      6      
2      0      00      1      2      3      4      5      6      
3      0      00      1      2      3      4      5      6      
4      1      2      4      5      7      8                  
5      1      2      3      4      5      6      7      8      9
6      2      3      5      6      8      9                  
7      4      5      7      8      10      11                  
8      4      5      6      7      8      9      10      11      12
9      5      6      8      9      11      12                  
10      7      8      10      11      13      14                  
11      7      8      9      10      11      12      13      14      15
12      8      9      11      12      14      15                  
13      10      11      13      14      16      17                  
14      10      11      12      13      14      15      16      17      18
15      11      12      14      15      17      18                  
16      13      14      16      17      19      20                  
17      13      14      15      16      17      18      19      20      21
18      14      15      17      18      20      21                  
19      16      17      19      20      22      23                  
20      16      17      18      19      20      21      22      23      24
21      17      18      20      21      23      24                  
22      22      23      25      26      28      29                  
23      19      20      21      22      23      24      25      26      27
24      20      21      23      24      26      27                  
25      22      23      25      26      28      29                  
26      22      23      24      25      26      27      28      29      30
27      23      24      26      27      29      30                  
28      25      26      28      29      31      32                  
29      25      26      27      28      29      30      31      32      33
30      26      27      29      30      32      33                  
31      28      29      31      32      34      35                  
32      28      29      30      31      32      33      34      35      36
33      29      30      32      33      35      36                  
34      31      32      33      34      35      36                  
35      31      32      33      34      35      36                  
36      31      32      33      34      35      36      

You will see this in the file that Victor has posted on the website.

Next, I used the SINGLE NUMBER play only. I have not tested when using different variations (for example, instead of playing 6 single numbers, you could play 1 line, or 3 splits, or 2 streets). I used only Single Numbers. For that, I used the Single Number progressions (Basic, Aggressive 1 and Aggressive 2).

The system lost in the long-run tests, however, if playing the LEAST minimum amount of chips (i.e., for 6 numbers, playing a line), the system would have busted out only once. This is encouraging to say the least. I think that if you applied some standards to it, such as waiting a certain number of spins (maybe a la J Solitude, etc.), you could really clean up on this system. Otherwise, with single numbers, the system busted out 4 times, which isn't too bad considering the amount of spins, and how long the progressions are, etc.

So, if you played them all the way out till bust, and you would need some hefty bankrolls, you would get the following results:

Using a Basic Progression: -8,198 units

Using the first Aggressive Progression: -9,062 units

Using the second Aggressive Progression: -30,951 units

I do think that this is a good system. However, not very conducive to playing at a real table because of the calculations involved. If you can get the calculations down quickly, then it would be solid. Just for fun, I will start playing this as an "Average" of the last 4 spins and see how that plays out – keeping all playing selections the same.

NOW...

What I am asking of you guys is to take a look at the progressions and help tweak this method. I think that waiting for a certain numbers of losses before betting is certainly a key - continuous betting has proven itself to be hazardous. Another key is a stop-win and stop-loss.

If we could come up with something feasible that would give us some nice profits, then this system is one of the better ones I've seen in a while.

I hope you all enjoy and thanks in advance for your input.

[xman1970]

A big hand to you from the Uk Cps10 [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif]

What you have done must of took a lot of time & effort, & for that I thank you  [smiley=dankk2.gif]

[cps10]

Thanks xman! I am exhausted from it!

[cps10]

-