Arte's So Called Holy Grail

[LuckoftheIrish]

A few years back Arte posted a roulette system (one of many) that he called a holy grail.  It backs the hits of the dominant even chance until a repeat.  He said he tested over millions of RNG spins, flat betting, and it was never negative.  Well I tested two variations of it and both were heavily negative. 

I have tested many of his systems over the last year or so and have found that none of them perform like he claims.  He either had bugs in his programs and/or was embellishing his results. 

[crackers]

He either had bugs in his programs and/or was embellishing his results.

He was most assuredly embellishing his results. He also had bugs between his ears too. In fact he'll chime in soon under his new name.

[cheese]

Arte and Gizmo are the same person. They think
alike, anyway..

[crackers]

Arte and Gizmo are the same person. They think
alike, anyway..

Cheese is an obnoxious poser. He never shares anything but worthless fantasy. He has nothing, so he attacks others. He's  not a real player. He just practices, rides  casino shuttles, and spends all his time on gambling forums teasing participants.

[iggiv]

I would ask u guys to stay away from personal attacks. Cheese by the way did not attack anyone now but just expressed opinion about someone who he thinks used 2 virtual IDs.

but I saw now that he is being kinda targeted.
well, I don't want this stuff to go to far away. So please.

p.s. I know Cheese is not what u r telling about him now. I don't know him personally but I have some reliable sources I can trust. But what is true, he does not reveal much  about his methods, just slight hints which so far have been very hard to use. He is very secretive. But on the other side he does not brag too much either. So I would say he is not a big trouble here in this forum.

and again I will ask u all kindly: please don't let those discussions about roulette methods come to personal level

[TwoCatSam]

For months I tested the SuperRoulette bot created by Tiago2 for Matt from Australia.

I learned a few things:  No way betting any proposition will work.  Following the last, next to the last, best of last five and on and on.  All failed.  I was betting play money, so the RNG had no reason to beat me.  While playing real money, I saw the same results.

The closest we ever came--while I was there--was having the program pick a random EC and betting on it.  Random seemed to pick random far better than I could.

Maybe I'm just a bad picker!

Sam

[iggiv]

there are a couple of things which can be used for beating roulette i think. Well, i am not EC game lover.

but when u take inside numbers, there are things to pay attention to: 1) roulette wheel layout (it can be reflected differently, for example with different matrices as per Kimo Li and so on) 2)
neighbours on this layout 3) law of the third

these things may work sometimes. They would not work if u try to beat roulette for long periods of time. But they may work if u try it from time to time. It is up to u to analyze timing and other technical details.

[cheese]

Cheese is an obnoxious poser. He never shares anything but worthless fantasy.

Cheese and his alter ego, Spike, coined the
phrase 'reading random'. Spike is getting
it trademarked so it can't be stolen by impostors.

[cheese]

-