Vortex, Eddies, gyro and energy fields produced!

[Rocky]

Haven't posted for a long time, but view this site frequently. Hi to everyone!

                                                                                  Been playing and studying roulette for 11 years now. AND HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION that no one has looked at this game from the perspective of the VORTICES, created over a number of spins to produce a situation, where from measuring, from a physics angle,  a predicted path to where the ball will land within a 12 spin cycle.

Rather than areas of low pressure say in the case of fluids and the objects moving within it being attracting toward the centre. Energy fields similar to those created in a gyro are established over a short of time over a few spins of the ball spinning within the roulette wheel and from there measurements taken to predict strong outcome/s within the next 12 spins.

Roulette may appear a random game to many and a lot believe a previous spin cannot affect the next according to probabilty, BUT this is not true when looked at from a physics perspective and especially where fields are created similar/like energy/ magnetic fields (or like a black hole) that literally suck the roulette ball and engulf it into its predetermined position on the wheel.

This is food for thought, and exciting revelations are there, for those who are prepared to study this phenomena

All the Best

Rocky
.

[TwoCatSam]

I'd like to hear more...........

[VLS]

Hi Rocky,

Feel free to elaborate.

You have an audience

[bombus]

If these forces exist and are noticeably impacting on the roulette outcomes then there must also exist a relatively simple and practical way to identify & chart the effects of this behavior.

If it's not relatively simple & practical then you are back to computer programs and electronic applications, which do not suit the vast majority of players.

[iggiv]

this is interesting. I remember some concept which i did not find in detail anywhere, it was like
studying route of ball from pocket to pocket and connect it somehow to the "most suitable routes" as if it was a bus driving from a point to another point.

i did no understand anything exactly and did no find any info, just mentioning it.

[Rocky]

Thankyou everyone I respect your thoughts, you're close iggiv, knowing the most common drop off points (so to speak) for the path of each number is half the key to this PHENOMENA.

The other half of the equation to this, is knowing, the least likely drop off point after the ball is spun,
and when combined with given specific points on the wheel where the ball at the same time is being attracted to (after observing a number of spins),  RIGHT NEAR these areas, is a position the ball is sucked into, right next to the one of the most common drop off positions (like being sucked into a black hole so to speak). This is usually explained as a near missby most without this knowledge.
To summarise simply,  the ball falls predominately into pocket/s of least drop off point, right next to strong drop off point pockets (these being narrowed to 3 or 4 ideally). The reason I say predominantly is that I've had a situation at the bottom of the wheel where there were two strong (almost the same in strength) attracting areas with corresponding black holes next to them equidistant apart and the ball has landed between the two areas TWICE (either side of the black holes or least likely drop off points).

But as one remarked earlier THIS may not be practical for most, as there are many long and labouriously hours, months and years of analysis and research to come up with the correct data, with many tests done.

My intention was to expand others thinking and possibilities of other options to approach the roulette wheel, thus, why I put it under this SECTION and seems iggiv has heard of similar concept.

I appreciate you all sharing.

Regards Rocky

[Rocky]

Yes bombus you are right, there is a way to chart these things if you have a very very slow table, because there is quite a lot of charting to be done by hand, ( comparing data and  analysis leading to a final decision) racing and sweating before the next spin.

And with the jostling at tables depending on the time of day ( the loud music, beers being spilt, people wanting to know what you're doing , especially the eye in the sky, etc).

Something like, learning visual ballistics may be more practical for most and a practical skill they will always have.

[iggiv]

VB is not an easy stuff. U have to move very quickly within couple of seconds before "no more bets" and still making calculations inside your heads on the go.

[ReDsQuaD]

Visual ballistics is not difficult once mastered, it's actually very easy. Your major efforts are evaluating how far the ball is landing from your visual prediction, establishing the long term variable's.

[iggiv]

is it so, Red? i've heard that  very few people in the world have really mastered it. At least
Frank Scoblete (well known roulette book author) gave up Laurance Scott's stuff.

[ReDsQuaD]

Yes it is so. The information you gathered is not quite correct. Visual ballistics is one of the TWO custom variants, casinos are aware of TWO of them and that's VB and Wheel bias.

So as you can appreciate, VB is used as a common method for overcoming the house edge. The simple reality is far far from "very few people in the world have really mastered it."

[iggiv]

OK thanx

[Steve]

Rocky, everything affects everything. Model the relationships in a practical way. The relationship is very fluid. The dynamic nature of roulette is not modeled by traditional advantage play like vb. What you have described is right up my alley. I've been saying it for a long time. Its not a matter of mere theory. It is all fact, but you need a practical way to exploit it.

Read the book "living energies" by callum coats.

[iggiv]

here it is:

nolinks://bearcy.com/9/6viktor.pdf

but can u apply it to roulette, Steve?
by the way u know that another "vls" forum is down?

[Steve]

rfcc was down because of server loading of two other sites of mine on same account. Fixed now.

Yes that is the right book. Hell yes, I have applied it to roulette. Some of the lessons in the book are part of the picture in that everything affects everything. But the application to roulette is the modeling between variables and spin outcome - a dynamic relationship.

[Steve]

-