A MUCH better (and easier) method on individual numbers

Loek2000 · October 23, 2012, 07:03:37 PM

Little test today. Reel wheel at Eurogrand (ladies) -15 euro. Unit 20 cents. Loss was bigger at first. Took a long time to get the pattern. Lots of Carre and streets. In the end 8 hits strait. Then loss again. Took a bit of loss to end it. I concur that it is like anything else in Roulette, it comes in streaks. I can't see how we could improve it. Progression is not the solution I guess.

Dane · October 24, 2012, 12:31:29 PM

To Loek2000: X0X0X.
In your desperate search for improvement of my system you could try to add streets to your betting. Finding the pattern there should be easy. Just a suggestion.

X0X0X
Dane

Loek2000 · October 24, 2012, 04:56:29 PM

I.m not desperate... I'ts my quest to find a foolproof system. I only know of one, but is not practical. I've already tried the streets. Is not an improvement. Thanks anyway.

TwoCatSam · October 25, 2012, 02:27:37 AM

Quote from: Loek2000 on October 24, 2012, 04:56:29 PM
I.m not desperate... I'ts my quest to find a foolproof system. I only know of one, but is not practical. I've already tried the streets. Is not an improvement. Thanks anyway.

I'd love to hear of a foolproof system. If it's not workable because you can't get your bets down, there's an answer.

Sam

Dane · October 25, 2012, 06:27:20 AM

Loek2000: You have already tried betting on streets too and concluded that it was not an improvement. Did you end the session if you won just on a street?
By the way: You have my permission to respond to Sam´s post too.
X0X0X
Dane

TwoCatSam · October 25, 2012, 09:55:29 AM

Dane

I'm off to the RNG casino today to try your system again. I'll try only it, so I'll keep track of the money.

Sam

TwoCatSam · October 25, 2012, 09:24:56 PM

Dane

Your system performed very well. I had three cases where two numbers were bet and they hit on the first spin. I went up about forty units. My units are .25.

Thanks!

Sam

Dane · October 26, 2012, 11:04:23 AM

Sam. You have just performed very well.

In the meantime I have started a new test series. I have added streets to my betting. Being extremely cautios I end the session if I win. Even if I just win on a street. So X = Three numbers or three streets. X0X0X. Of course I also stops if any street (1-36)or any corner comes with all its numbers.
Four sessions per Permanenz (table 3, Spielbank Wiesbaden). After the first fortnight of 2011 (i.e. 14x2 sessions): 209 units (chips)
X0X0X
Dane

Dane · October 26, 2012, 12:03:33 PM

Corrections: Of course I meant X = One number or one street. X0X0X. And four sessions per Permanenz in a fortnight should be 14x4 sessions.
After having added streets to my betting I am sure that one session in most cases ends with X0X0X.
Dane

Loek2000 · October 27, 2012, 05:13:47 PM

Hi Dane,

Yes, I stopped as soon as I had a win on a street. Therefore I did not win enough cos I count from the last highest balance. It's even difficult to win if you treat it like tennis. Win some sets, lose some sets, as long as you win the game. I am tempted to use a progression.

As for a foolproof system, I know a few.
Play an even money bet. Craps, Blackjack or Roulette. Bet one unit to start and after a loss you raise your bet with one unit after each decision, win or lose. Keep doing that until you are ahead. It's foolproof cos in a nearly even proposition (I play only one zero wheel) it is certain you will win. It's flaw is that sometimes it takes to long before winning bets are dominate again. One counteraction is to make the progression steeper. Go up 2 units win or lose and profit comes quicker and your sure you'll win. But I advice against this system cos like with Labouchere (cancellation system) it lulls you into believing it's safe enough to play until you have won your weight in gold. A long adverse run makes the bests get bigger and bigger until you run into the table limit or your own or both. Try it (fun money) and you'll see you will always win. Play it for real and you need a big heart very soon! I've tried 2 Dozen as well. So the same dozen all the time (64.8%win chance). I lost my guts sooner then the table limit. But the system has merit and is foolproof. Until you run into a limit and then the loss is enormous. Like with Martingale and with stocks and writing an option. If you know of a workaround to limit bets and still keep close to foolproof that would be great. The best I know of is a short series of predetermined bets and when you reach the end you start over. Play it both ways as if you have a virtual partner and you can win both ways. Still even that is not a free ride. Anyway, back to Dane's topic. I am curious how it will behave in the long run. I tested it with a few hundred Hamburg results and I am not overly impressed. But nice result TwoCat Sam. $1000 is a very decent result. But don't quite your day job yet...

TwoCatSam · October 27, 2012, 10:07:21 PM

$1000 is a very decent result.

Yeah, I wish. Forty units at .25 each is ten bucks.

Dane · October 28, 2012, 04:45:57 AM

I too prefer real wheels (0-36). It seems like adding streets to our betting was not an improvement. I did not have much luck, so I have left the streets again. Sorry. X0X0X
Dane

Loek2000 · October 28, 2012, 09:06:56 PM

Sorry Sam! I overlooked the dot....... 10 bucks is nice too

Dane · December 11, 2012, 04:22:39 AM

IF you are familiar with the procedure and the patterns, you should be able to double your work by adding 36 more spaces (3x12) to your paper. Place 1-12 in the 1st column
13-24 - - 2nd -
25-36 - - 3rd - .

X0X0X
dane

jjFX · December 30, 2012, 05:27:37 PM

One question...
Lets imagine that we are on the 6th spin and 7th, numbers are 34,25...
Do you add to your betting number 28 and 31 or just keep betting without adding 28,31?

Thanks

jjFX · December 30, 2012, 05:27:37 PM

-

News:

A MUCH better (and easier) method on individual numbers