hi everyone... correct me a asap please.

[misfit101]

Hi everyone, ive been reading this forum for awhile now but never registered . Here's what I have to say . I found a system on a site that seems alright . Plz read it all even when I say the word progression.
You bet 1 $ on a double street that hasnt been hit 4 times then you use a progression 1-1-1-1-1-2-2-2-3-3-4-5-6-7
thats only 39$ for 14 + the 4 before so 18 spins
your chances are more then decent.
And yes I know this can fail but guess what I do in a casino . I gamble . If I dont have 39 $ to risk perhaps working overtime is a better option then the casino.
hit me back
ps never go to Montreal,Canada to gamble

[harryj]

Hi Misfit,
       Losing streaks of 18+ while not common do occur quite frequently. I can make 2 suggestions.

1} Only start betting if the 'line'(DS) fails to hit in 6 spins. This happens frequently enough not to leave you permanently on the bench.

2] If we define a martingale as any progression that is completed with a single win. Then we can insert 'insurance' or 'cooler' bets along the way, which increase the number of steps at little or no extra cost..... EG.

    An extra 2u bet at step 9 Will give you a 15 step progression, at the cost of 2u and a possible 1u loss at bets 9 and 11.
    An extra 1u at bet 6 will allow 2 extra steps for only 5u increase in bankroll. You will have to sacrifice profit at bets 6,9,11 and accept a loss  of 2u at bet 13, 1u at 14 iuat 15 and 2u at 16.
      Played with 6 virtual steps that gives you a 22 step progression. that is 16 times safer than the 18 you planned.

     This type of play may seem stupid at first, but if you can avoid losing the whole progression you are bound to end up in profit.

     Regards       Harry

[martinnng]

I think it can be quite time consuming method, because of waiting for 4 numbers from one DS. I mean time to profit ratio. Don't  get it as impatience please.

I'm sorry, I didn't get correctly.

[xman1970]

ps never go to Montreal,Canada to gamble

Care to elaborate on this comment pls ?

[RobbieD]

Play around with the progression and it can win. But, like all systems, it will die eventually.

I use a piece of roulette software to test simple systems like this - but I will only reference it with permission of the Mods.......

[beretta28]

Do you think that waiting for a double street that has not been hit for 4 times or 6 times or 30 times is the way to increase the probability of winning?
LOL LOL

[harryj]

Do you think that waiting for a double street that has not been hit for 4 times or 6 times or 30 times is the way to increase the probability of winning?
LOL LOL

    Hi Beretta,
               The waiting period  merely indicates that a bet might be possible. It is only part of the overall trigger that fires the bet.

      First the gambler must establish the frequency at which sixlines occur. This information must be tabulized and a range selected that gives a hit rate in the high 90's. A progression is then formulated to bet that range economically. It is never possible to accomadate the longest possible 'sleep' so the cost of lost progressions must be factored in.

    Only then can it be assessed if the method has a chance to win.

    Regards       Harry

[Azim]

Hi everyone, ive been reading this forum for awhile now but never registered . Here's what I have to say . I found a system on a site that seems alright . Plz read it all even when I say the word progression.
You bet 1 $ on a double street that hasnt been hit 4 times then you use a progression 1-1-1-1-1-2-2-2-3-3-4-5-6-7
thats only 39$ for 14 + the 4 before so 18 spins
your chances are more then decent.
And yes I know this can fail but guess what I do in a casino . I gamble . If I dont have 39 $ to risk perhaps working overtime is a better option then the casino.
hit me back
ps never go to Montreal,Canada to gamble

Care to share why you say that?

[Azim]

-