VERSION 333

[hermes]

They are many bright minds working together on this forum (at least I don't feel alone) and I felt that I should contribute also to this great team.
Long time ago I tested a system called Ludomeccanica from author Diodoro with mixed results. Recently friend of my sent me the version again and because nothing happens without reason I took a deeper look at the system. The author writes that Jesuits created the infernal machine which gave 666 (the sign of devil). He didn't see far enough that Jesuit's order self is 666. You cannot beat devil with devil. He thought that he decoded the wheel but I lost more than won with his decoded combination.
I modified the system by cutting the 666 on the head in half and got 333. I made two columns of the European roulette by cutting it in the middle over the zero (zero out) and got column A and column B.
column A/ 1-3-5-7-9-12-14-16-18-20-22-24-26-28-29-31-33-35
column B/ 2-4-6-8-10-11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-27-30-32-34-36
Now, the author recommends to mark 18 spins for Euro roulette and 24 spins for US roulette. I don't recommend to play it on US roulette. On Euro roulette my recommendation is to mark down 24 spins before play. You get less #s to bet.
That's important: Bet always the column where more numbers came but bet the numbers which didn't come yet! E.g. A-10, B-7, bet missing numbers from column A. If both columns (A-9,B-9) are even you can bet both but if you are cautious don't bet any. Make a new 24 spins chart. My experience is that sometimes you win both and sometimes one and lose the other one. Why take a chance of losing. The decision is yours. If zero comes during marking down disregard it. Doesn't count.
The author recommends progression but I found out that your number comes up in less than 5 spins in 95% of the time (mostly between 1st and 3rd spin). Therefore, progression is not needed just flat betting up to 5th spin. If lost mark the next 24 spins and bet again. You will win 9 of 10 sessions most of the time. I can put the authors progression if somebody will request.
The winnings highly override the losses.
The author made version 2 which I don't like because you have to bet between 12 and 15 numbers and he recommends progression! Too many #s to bet. He would bet the column which has less numbers canceled. Not a good idea. Too many Jesuits together.
Cheers Hermes

[KFC]

Hi, not sure i get it can you give a example please?

thanks

[Kingspin]

Hi hermes , just tried your system and got a hit on the first spin.  I had 9 unhit numbers on column A which had hit 15 times. Column B had hit only 9 times. Nice system thanks.......... No 33  came in first spin...

[iceberg1912]

Hi Hermes,
I've just tested the system for 94 spins at DB at it looks good!
I've play countinually instead of recharge after 24 spins.
In few words I play for the numbers not show in the dominant section (A/B).
Waiting for few numbers is a little boring, but profitable.
Maybe is better play recharging evry 24 spins.
What do you think?
Ice
Ps it would be nice if someone could rx code the system.

[TwoCatSam]

hermes

I'd like to put this point blank:  Do you feel this system will produce profits over a period of time? 

Sam

[winkel]

Hi TCS, it won´t.

because it is just a version of the game of monks or enigmista or some of the other "esoterical-numbers-games"

I tested it a long time ago it made his way to losses as any other esoterical numberselection. sorry I didn´t keep the records. but it is like Herb always tells: If betselction is based on If numbers appeared/not appeared...then play numbers that appeared/not appeared.... it will hit the average in statistics of the numbers played. In short it will end in -2,7/-5,4%.

The only one that worked quite well was the Kabballa-system.

br
winkel

[iceberg1912]

Hi winkel,
even if there's a esoterical introduction (in which I don't belive too), maybe there's some logic in the system.
Play it countinually allows to follow the patterns trends with thems sleepers...
I don't maybe It worth a long term test..
Regards
Ice

[TwoCatSam]

I am going to quote hermes in blue:

The winnings highly override the losses.

To me this means this thing has been put to the test, else how could he make such a statement?

hermes?

TwoCat

[JLP]

Hi Winkel,

The only one that worked quite well was the Kabballa-system.

br
winkel

How´s the kabballa-system mate???
Can you explain it?

Cheers,
JLP.-

[hermes]

Hi guys I like the discussion around the system. Winkel tested the old version and I agree with him I lost more than won on that system that's why I abandoned it. But I modified it and that's the difference. Winkel has to start test from the beginning if he want to get the truth. What's wrong with esoterica?
Guys are you afraid of it because it is spiritual matter? Don't be worry your soul is an old esoteric professor and she/he understand everything what's metaphysical. Metaphysics is the world of your soul. Don't be scared of yourself. You are the soul not the body.

Sam I tested the modified version on around 500 real wheel spins only because no time left for ice cream. I lost 2 sessions that's 65 units at $1 and won 374 units. I don't know if it is enough?
If you want to try it for real money bet 0.50 cents or maximum $1 per number but only on real wheels and with one zero. You have nothing to lose only get more experience and win almost for sure. How it performs in long term? Only Jesuits know, ask them.
The skip of the charting 24 spins before bets must be tested before known if it is advantage or disadvantage. I didn't skip anything I am patient and careful when I gamble.
Have a fun
Hermes

[iceberg1912]

Hi Hermes,
thank you for replay, I'll try to not skip the 24 spins and test more.
Ice
ps. there is a great difference from esoterica/metaphysical to spiritual or religious, but that's another story...

[Jakkalsdraai]

  Thanx for the post Hermes.

I liked the look of this the moment I read it. I will also test and post results.

Thanx for sharing.

Jakk

[JHM]

Hi TCS, it won´t.

because it is just a version of the game of monks or enigmista or some of the other "esoterical-numbers-games"

I tested it a long time ago it made his way to losses as any other esoterical numberselection. sorry I didn´t keep the records. but it is like Herb always tells: If betselction is based on If numbers appeared/not appeared...then play numbers that appeared/not appeared.... it will hit the average in statistics of the numbers played. In short it will end in -2,7/-5,4%.

The only one that worked quite well was the Kabballa-system.

br
winkel

Sorry if I get you wrong winkle, but you always bet a number that has appeared / not appeared. Else you wouldn't be playing Roulette.

[TwoCatSam]

hermes

Thank you for that answer. 

I would love to see test results.  I am testing three systems and have two on the menu for testing next, but I'd test it if I could.

Sam

[kawa4711]

Hi, Hermes,

column A/ 1-3-5-7-9-12-14-16-18-20-22-24-26-28-29-31-33-35
column B/ 2-4-6-8-10-11-13-15-17-19-21-23-25-27-30-32-34-36
Now, the author recommends to mark 18 spins for Euro roulette and 24 spins for US roulette. I don't recommend to play it on US roulette. On Euro roulette my recommendation is to mark down 24 spins before play. You get less #s to bet.

I this the modified version?(

I tested the modified version on around 500 real wheel spins only because no time left for ice cream. I lost 2 sessions that's 65 units at $1 and won 374 units. I don't know if it is enough?

)

Best regards

kawa4711

[kawa4711]

-