Spike's Laughing Heads

[Spike]

"Which system do I choose to win with today?" by TwoCatSam  This post was moved from it's original position and put in the pit.  I am putting it back.  Spike wants to have a laugh!  I don't have any problem with that.  It is a rather bold statement!!

[smiley=3D-gal/36_2_33.gif] [smiley=Best_of_fichiers/36_1_20.gif] [smiley=3D-gros-anim/36_2_33.gif]

[Mr J]

Its your money, you choose. Ken

[TwoCatSam]

To all

This is the best I could do.  I don't know how to put it back into the thread exactly where it came from. 

Are we good now??

Sam

[Talesman]

I have to admit now that I see it, it is funny, Garish, but funny.

Most folks can't find one plan that works and Sam apparently has many.

I also had no idea you could make smileys that big!!

[TwoCatSam]

Plans people say work:

Ronjo.....who knows today?  He probably has many.
ray.....proved it on this forum
Gamlet....."Fire" and "Ice"
mr. j..........furtherest back
Addonai..a verison of Gamlet.
Lanky.....hell, two or three or four
Clint....a version of RR and four sectors
Lohnro....the d/s system
hammy....the lurchy/hammy system
Mr. Chips....the 4Selecta
winkel.....the G.U.T.
Victor.......Lw
bobbybobby.....three or four
Me...the Chicco/murph system wich is up over 1200 and may fail tomorrow.
Peter is going to prove the Sniper works.

Matty is working hard on one but hasn't declared it a winner.

I am scared I've forgotten someone.  If so, name yourself and accept my appologies.

AND.....Victor personally knows people who make a living at roulette.  Perhaps they play a system; maybe the Atilla!  Maybe Atilla himself!!

I can not and will not assume all of these people are just blowing in the wind.  I know people believe what they want to believe, but if you don't believe it you can never achieve it!  That little engine did not say....I don't think I can!

So---pardon me every chance you get---but I will maintain a positive attitude and keep on plugging away.

Spike and the naysayers can do a lot of things but---unless I let them---they can never stop me from winning money at the casinos. 

Good Day!!

Sam

[lucky_strike]

Spike and the naysayers can do a lot of things

Well all that I see they do is to post smiles or talk about ridiculus "woodo magical guess work" with no real demonstrations and make ridiculus claims.

You have a lot of that at GG and I do hope we will see less of that here.

Cheers Lucky Strike

[TwoCatSam]

You're right, LS.......

I should have said they can "say" a lot of things.  By the word "do" I was referring to verbal rocks and taunts and slurs.  "Stinkers" Andy called them. LOL

Sam

[bliss]

Sam,

The funniest thing is that Spike's claims are the most outrageous of all, but he will very conveniently never prove them or reveal his methods. At least those systems you mentioned can be tested and verified.

[TwoCatSam]

All...

People ask me why I just don't go back and bet on the Lw system if I really feel it works. Or Gamlet.  

I have tucked those two systems away in my psyche and hold them there as a form of knowledge that roulette can be beaten.  Frankly, I'm scared of pulling them out and testing them again as I'm afraid it was all just luck.  Then what do I have?  I live in daily fear that all my work---and there have been thousands of hours over the years---will amount to nothing.  Who wants on his tombstone?: HERE LIES A FOOL WHO TRIED TO BEAT ROULETTE

So I bust me arse hunting one more working system--just one more--just one more.  I think I've found it with the Chicco/murph.  Maybe I'll tuck it away and go to playing the Lws again.

We humans develop a belief system and--deep in our hearts--we are scared to death to test it.  Well, at least I am.

Sam

[bliss]

Sam, that's a refreshingly honest post. 

[TicTacToe]

This guy walks into the psychiatrist's office ( lets call him TCS for sake of a better name ). TCS says " Doc, can you cure me ? "

Doc answers " Sure, can you give me a bit more to go on ? "

TCS says " OK for starters you track 18 spins .... "


TTT


Ok, I thought it was funny


PS... We admire you TwoCatSam ( was gonna say love but I figured I'd wait till after our first encounter. ) 

[gizmotron]

Plans people say work:

Ronjo.....who knows today?  He probably has many.
ray.....proved it on this forum
Gamlet....."Fire" and "Ice"
mr. j..........furtherest back
Addonai..a verison of Gamlet.
Lanky.....hell, two or three or four
Clint....a version of RR and four sectors
Lohnro....the d/s system
hammy....the lurchy/hammy system
Mr. Chips....the 4Selecta
winkel.....the G.U.T.
Victor.......Lw
bobbybobby.....three or four
Me...the Chicco/murph system wich is up over 1200 and may fail tomorrow.
Peter is going to prove the Sniper works.

Matty is working hard on one but hasn't declared it a winner.

I am scared I've forgotten someone.  If so, name yourself and accept my appologies.
Sam

Of all these methods/systems, how many of them have been openly tested with computers, where the source code and methodology of the computer's solutions, has been peer reviewed by experts? How many of these systems have normal expectations where the house's edge actually appears to dominate them in the long run.

I have stood those stated standards without fear that I was diminishing myself in attempting to validate systems and concepts that might or might not actually work in the long run.  It is not my goal to have a gotcha moment or to declare a fallacy here or there. I'm only interested in the truth. I can't apologize for attempting to get at that truth. I can't worry about who's toes are being stepped on. I thought all this testing was to prove something. If I've learned anything. It takes millions of trials to get to that truth.

[Boo_Ray]

you are forgeting that roulette is not a computer..
For optimal playing you have to wisely use human brain cells to counter some situations.. Computer doesn't have such thing so it cant be done on computer..
Computer computer computer...
Computer did beat best chess players in the world... but who designed computer?..who programed it?...
Once human takes a millions of spins and programs computer for every situation it is still not sure that in next ten millions of spins nothing new will happen..
These guys can beat roulette, day after day but someday they can lose, but their wise decission will be key of success..how would computer react in such situation? .. Computer will continue to play "session from hell"

[JHM]

Plans people say work:

Ronjo.....who knows today?  He probably has many.
ray.....proved it on this forum
Gamlet....."Fire" and "Ice"
mr. j..........furtherest back
Addonai..a verison of Gamlet.
Lanky.....hell, two or three or four
Clint....a version of RR and four sectors
Lohnro....the d/s system
hammy....the lurchy/hammy system
Mr. Chips....the 4Selecta
winkel.....the G.U.T.
Victor.......Lw
bobbybobby.....three or four
Me...the Chicco/murph system wich is up over 1200 and may fail tomorrow.
Peter is going to prove the Sniper works.

Matty is working hard on one but hasn't declared it a winner.

I am scared I've forgotten someone.  If so, name yourself and accept my appologies.
Sam

Of all these methods/systems, how many of them have been openly tested with computers, where the source code and methodology of the computer's solutions, has been peer reviewed by experts? How many of these systems have normal expectations where the house's edge actually appears to dominate them in the long run.

I have stood those stated standards without fear that I was diminishing myself in attempting to validate systems and concepts that might or might not actually work in the long run.  It is not my goal to have a gotcha moment or to declare a fallacy here or there. I'm only interested in the truth. I can't apologize for attempting to get at that truth. I can't worry about who's toes are being stepped on. I thought all this testing was to prove something. If I've learned anything. It takes millions of trials to get to that truth.

So actually you're saying it's pointless what we are doing? Or do I get you wrong?

[MattyMattz]

Plans people say work:

Ronjo.....who knows today?  He probably has many.
ray.....proved it on this forum
Gamlet....."Fire" and "Ice"
mr. j..........furtherest back
Addonai..a verison of Gamlet.
Lanky.....hell, two or three or four
Clint....a version of RR and four sectors
Lohnro....the d/s system
hammy....the lurchy/hammy system
Mr. Chips....the 4Selecta
winkel.....the G.U.T.
Victor.......Lw
bobbybobby.....three or four
Me...the Chicco/murph system wich is up over 1200 and may fail tomorrow.
Peter is going to prove the Sniper works.

Matty is working hard on one but hasn't declared it a winner.

I am scared I've forgotten someone.  If so, name yourself and accept my appologies.
Sam

Of all these methods/systems, how many of them have been openly tested with computers, where the source code and methodology of the computer's solutions, has been peer reviewed by experts? How many of these systems have normal expectations where the house's edge actually appears to dominate them in the long run.

I have stood those stated standards without fear that I was diminishing myself in attempting to validate systems and concepts that might or might not actually work in the long run.  It is not my goal to have a gotcha moment or to declare a fallacy here or there. I'm only interested in the truth. I can't apologize for attempting to get at that truth. I can't worry about who's toes are being stepped on. I thought all this testing was to prove something. If I've learned anything. It takes millions of trials to get to that truth.

Hey Giz,
I have always appriciated your input.  And, as always (to me atleast) you make a good point.  I am more than willing to have my "system" tested by a computer... once I've finished tweaking it.  Actually I look forward to it, because no matter the results, I'll still play it.  If the results are good - all the more confidence in the system.  If the results are bad, oh well - maybe I'm just lucky then.  That's one thing that a computer can't account for... luck.  Just last month I was playing at a live casino and there were 8 blacks in a row on the marquee.  So some guy comes along and starts betting Red... over and over again... (you know where this is going...).  another 10 blacks come and the guy is outta money.  Once he's done betting I plop down some chips on red and bang, Red.  Maybe it's me?  I'll take luck any day.  

Did that make any sense??  Or was I just pulling a Sam and blabbing to myself??  LOL

[MattyMattz]

-