Ronjo's Systems

[davo]

Can the actual rules be clearly spelled out because they are testing one of them at the other forum and people have no idea how he comes to make the bet decisions. At least then we can all check our own store of real casino numbers to see how it is going. Why don't the two forums amalgamate because basically the same people are at each?

[Compa]

Can the actual rules be clearly spelled out because they are testing one of them at the other forum and people have no idea how he comes to make the bet decisions. At least then we can all check our own store of real casino numbers to see how it is going. Why don't the two forums amalgamate because basically the same people are at each?

Here you go mate:


We have three different groups of 12#s which you are already aware of

but I will layout the setup for other members who are new to roulette.

 

G1



G2    



G3  

                         

--------------------------------------

LINES:



1-2-3-10-11-12(G1)



1-7-8-9-10-11 (G2)



1-3-6-8-11-12 (G3)

--------------------------------------

SINGLEPLAY:



Group (1) 1-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-31

Group (2) 2-20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28-29-32

Group (3) 3-4-5-6-7-8-9-30-33-34-35-36

--------------------------------------

Now to start we need three spins which we already have 16-35-13

sowe have group 2 that is absent from the 3 spins it showed 6 spins back so we bet on group 2

with one chip on each number; 2-20-21-22-23-24-25-26-27-28-29-32



Rules:

1) After the fourth losing bet we stop chasing the losing group and we do one of two things

which will be track another three spins and select a new group and carry on with the progression

or after the fourth losing bet we bet on the trending group (my favourite) and carry on with the progression.

2) If we are positive in profit we always reset to betting with one chip on a new game.

3) progression:Always stick to the progression, do not panic and add more chips.

which is 1-1-1-2 if we have lost these four bets take the last 3 losing bets and add them up

and divide by 2 will give us 1-1-1-2-2 and if that bet loses add up will give five so we make it

a round figure which is six and divide by two is 1-1-1-2-2-3 and you keep doing this.

4) Picking the groups:



I will explain as we go along.

This is what we are going to do,Lohnro you will after four losses track another three numbers

while Wiseguy will after four losses bet on the trending group and I will carry on with aggressive play.

So at the end we can decide which out of the three different ways of attack is the best.

Right Lanky we are set for the result.

And thanks Lohnro Wiseguy for joining and I hope we do well.

Ronjo.

-------------------------------------------------------------------


Cheers
/Compa

[davo]

Thanks Compa. So we are looking for a sequence of three spins where one of the groups is missing initially right? Then after the fourth losing bet we can go two different ways, so it is flexible which is a concern to me. Has anyone else played this for real apart from Ronjo?

[admin]

Why don't the two forums amalgamate because basically the same people are at each?

Hello mate,

I think every forum has it own "taste"...

Regarding the same members, well, just look at GamblersGlen and VIP, they have roughly the same active memberlist but are day and night when contrated in manners or sharing.

At GG there is "carte blanche" for insults and name calling, while VIP is gracefully moderated.

Of course RSR makes a good job at RouletteForum.net



If you wish, think of this forum as an extension of the "Roulette Section".

This is entirely devoted to this beautiful and wondeful game while at RouletteForum.net there is a larger scope such as poker, blackjack, craps, etc...

[Ronjo]

Can the actual rules be clearly spelled out because they are testing one of them at the other forum and people have no idea how he comes to make the bet decisions. At least then we can all check our own store of real casino numbers to see how it is going. Why don't the two forums amalgamate because basically the same people are at each?

Hi Davo,
That test was long gone tested already by Lanky and myself,What I have posted recently was last weeks play that I actually played in the casino as I did that to help a couple of players who already have the system before the hacker destroyed the board,and I will continue to post my play for these players so when they see something I have done they can ask me why and that is how we all learn including myself I am open to constructive critism,If it makes it more comfortable for you I will only post on this board as it is a only roulette board and I will make this my home , if you like I can chat to you in the chat room or lay everything out for you again "THE RULES" note are in inverted commas are really just guidelines to change play to get away from the downswings and most times I just take what the table is giving me when I am losing.Lanky seems to be having some success with it although I dont know what his results are, as well as Iggy but Lanky has incorporated his own style(tweaked) to suit his play, the bottom line is not to see how much we can win but to keep the losses to a minimum compared to the wins in this very unfair game.The problem with these due systems is that they come in waves and we need to recognise this and make the adjustment we are not always right in our judgement and we must tred on thin ice if we play a mathematical system with the help of progression for to long (many spins) as they all bust out sooner or later sometimes too soon sometimes straight away.No one would play this game if they thought they couldnt win, we all think we can win, and roulette can be beaten or else the casinos wouldnt bother with the countermeasures,but I can tell you this there is no holygrail and there is no gaurentee for profits.
Ronjo.

[Kingspin]

I have not tested this method more than about  3 hundred spins ,  Session 1 lasted 1 hour at a spin per minute profit + 220.

Session 2 was 3 hours long , i started with £2  chips , after making 300 chips profit i used £5 chips , eventually with 1 hour left of my playing session i was playing using £20 chips, end result was +1800.
Starting bankroll was 500 so i finished up with £2300.  This system looks very good .  I really like this one.

[wiggy]

Hey Kingspin nice stats!

Was that with real money betting or just testing?

Also - which betting strategy did you choose? (Lines or straight betting stopping at 4 losses or chasing the hit with the suggested progression?)

[Kingspin]

It was with real money wiggy. The best way i find to play this ronjo's system is the 12 number straight way. How i played and win £1800 much was part to pure good luck , i have played 3 sessions since the good session i posted about & sad to say these other  3 sessions did not perform too good. 

Here is a sequence i hit, Number Groups 1 2 3   i  have re named to A B C for my liking.
B A A B A B B B B A A C B B A A B C C , so as you can see B A A was the last 3 number groups spun so i started to bet on C group. I lost all 4 bets. i re started on the trending B group and won.
You can get long strings of repeat groups that make you loose with this system and it happens quite often too so it has to be played with caution.

[Lanky]

Hi Kingspin .

Mate I have gone through your bets & I found this would have been the case.
That is if I have understood You correctly.

B A A=  Group C is due.

B-L Bet 1 Lost-1
A-L Bet 1 lost-2
B-L Bet 1 lost-3
B-L Bet 2 lost-5 (Last 4 lost bets are now 1 1 1 2 =5 <divided by 2=3 to bet)

>>You said You bet the dominant Group B from here

B-W Bet 3 win=96 outlay Less 108 return={12} Profit

Now call on 3 more numbers

B A A= Group C due

C-W Bet 1 win 24 +12={36} Profit

Call on 3 more numbers

B B A= Group C is due

A-L Bet 1-1
B-L Bet 1 lost-2
C-W Bet 1 Won=Even and a carryover Profit of {36} units

Call on 3 more numbers
C

So a total of {36} units profit.

Lanky.

[See_Jerek]

Hi Kingspin .

Mate I have gone through your bets & I found this would have been the case.
That is if I have understood You correctly.

B A A=  Group C is due.

B-L Bet 1 Lost-1
A-L Bet 1 lost-2
B-L Bet 1 lost-3
B-L Bet 2 lost-5 (Last 4 lost bets are now 1 1 1 2 =5 <divided by 2=3 to bet)

>>You said You bet the dominant Group B from here

B-W Bet 3 win=96 outlay Less 108 return={12} Profit

Now call on 3 more numbers

B A A= Group C due

C-W Bet 1 win 24 +12={36} Profit

Call on 3 more numbers

B B A= Group C is due

A-L Bet 1-1
B-L Bet 1 lost-2
C-W Bet 1 Won=Even and a carryover Profit of {36} units

Call on 3 more numbers
C

So a total of {36} units profit.

Lanky.

Hello Lanky,

There is word that you only play top systems.LWs is one of them,JS Raindrop is an other 1 too but you have higher entry points and its only a side bet so I take it that you use this as a secondary system.I guess Ronjo's 12 numbers is also one of those that you play often is it fact or myth mate?

[Lanky]

Hello Lanky,

There is word that you only play top systems.LWs is one of them,JS Raindrop is an other 1 too but you have higher entry points and its only a side bet so I take it that you use this as a secondary system.I guess Ronjo's 12 numbers is also one of those that you play often is it fact or myth mate?

Hi Jerek.

My Mate there has been some misunderstanding along the way some where.
I never actually said that I play John Solitudes way.

This is what I said in my report written on the 30 th October 2007

Outside of this I had another 2 losses doing other things
-$550
-$200
.............
-$750
However using Ronjo's Methods & a touch of Me & John Solitude Mixed In .
I won .

$1869-$750 =$1119 Profit. 

Thanks Ronjo ....You're a beauty Mate.We are Grateful to You too Cobber.

I however would never play to those entry points that John Solitude has written about and really I think He meant them only as a guide anyway.

Example..18 numbers =7 misses.

I did have a 18 & 19 number section that I would not come into unless its missed at least 10 to 11 times in a row.
And it mainly Does hit on the 11th or 12th spin.

The most I have ever seen it miss in person is 14 times.
I was lucky I did not notice it that day until it passed.
Because I was in battle with the Casino over the Lw.

However I think Herb said He has seen it miss 27 times in a row in Vegas one day.

Now on a $5 table that's at least a $90 bet.

You don't want too many of them to miss Jerek.

I was prepared to risk $570 for these 3 bets if it was the 19 number section.
Luckily for Me it never went past the 3rd bet.

I DON"T play this way any more.
The risk reward is too high.

Another example would be the 12 or 13 number Section bet.
I would never come in unless its missed a minimum of 12 times in a row.
I have waited upwards of 14 to 19 & more spins plenty of times before it hit & then I have come in for a limited amount of bets.

Now these 12 or 13 number sections that I have played I learnt from My Good Friend Kimo Li from His Global Pie Method.

Now to Ronjo's 3 Group numbers.

We tested this over hundreds of spins over many days on another Forum when we were all over there. Approx 18 months or so ago.
My Mate Lohnro supplied Me the numbers.

And I think from memory Sam had them sent to Him as well.

There was no possible way that Ronjo could fudge the numbers.
It was an impossibility for Him know what the numbers were.

Unfortunately the Forum crashed & we lost the record of the test.
But I think from memory JLP Has or had saved them to a Rar file.

Now I have been sick with Operations etc for the Last year & I may get the exact figures wrong so don't quote Me on them.
And maybe My Friends Lohnro and or JLP can help us out here.

But I think it won $14,000 + & My Share was Half........Lmao.

Whatever it was I laid claimed to half of the winnings ..hahahhahahha.

Ronjo actually sent me a picture of Him protecting My share of the chips on the Table of His wheel that He has at His Place.
God Love Him.

This amount whatever it was would of come about because Ronjo bets in $25 units.

As far as inside number bets go.
I think Ronjo's Method is pretty darn good...

That & the GPM Method are probably the two best I have ever seen long term.

I have tweaked both of them so that I can use them in conjunction with the Lw method.
If I am waiting for bets with the Lw then I will look at them.

I mainly use them as Victor's Waker Method.
EG: 12/37=3+1= 4 Bets.

To answer You questions Jerek.

Yes I mainly play them as Secondary Methods.
Yes I think they are Top Methods.
And More importantly I have Won Money with them.


Your Friend.

Lanky.

[See_Jerek]

Mate,

Its good to hear from you I know for a fact you only play systems that will win.As for the raindrop method,I totally agreed with you that you win a little but you risk a lot.I know this for a fact,it can hurt when it tanks.

[See_Jerek]

-