Bet selection with an random element with one static rule.

[lucky_strike]

You can pick any outcomes you want randomly, as long they all begin with the same if you divide them into 3.
Here is some random bet selections.

BBBBBPBBP
PBPPPBPPP

BBPBPPBBPBPB
PPBPBPPPBPBB

The static rule is that every sequense of 3 start with the same outcome.

BBB BBP BBP
PBP PPB PPP

BBP BPP BBP BPB
PPB PBP PPB PBB

No bet selection will be the same as the previos one, so you will never play with or against the same sequense twice.
You get reducing bets if you use every third to become an indicator to what to play with or against or you could just go for same / oppisite for all trails.

Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play with the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 18 trails with 6 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play against the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 18 trails with 6 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play with the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 24 trails with 8 steps of wagering.



Here you have an illustration with an chart thats show you how to play against the flow.
You play once to hit an winning bet, this is just to illustrate the method.
This is a sequense of 24 trails with 8 steps of wagering.



I have not test this but its an idea.

Cheers Lucky Strike

[lucky_strike]

Any toughts or comments...

Cheers LS

[JLP]

Any toughts or comments...

Cheers LS

Hi Lucky,

Nice idea mate, but when you decide to bet with or against with the flow???
It depends on what the table is throwing at the moment.
I see you bet in the second and third bet of the random pattern - this is right??
You wait for first outcome and bet in the following 2 ones?
And the bet selection progression - flat bet, D`Alembert or Fibonacci maybe??
If you can put an example test.
No - I have a better idea.
Here is the outcomes of a session shoe from Dublinbet.
How you would play this shoe using your idea??

Dealer Ota
[colorsb]
   B
P   
P   
   B
T   T
P   
P   
P   
   B
   B
P   
   B
   B
P   
P   
P   
   B
   B
P   
   B
P   
   B
   B
   B
P   
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
   B
P   
   B
P   
P   
P   
   B
T   T
   B
   B
P   
   B
P   
   B
P   
   B
   B
   B
P   
P   
P   
P   
   B
   B
P   
P   
   B
P   
P   
   B
   B
[/colorsb]
Thanks for sharing your idea.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[lucky_strike]

Hi JLP and all.
Thanks for your kind words.
Now the tought is that you would play against or with 24 bankers or players in a row, but you would never play against the same 24 in a row, because the 24 continue to change and are never the same, they are bet selections with an random element with one static rule.
So you have to hit an momentum.
18 would be 9 or 6 bets.
24 would be 12 or 8 bets.
I think this only would work if you play online, because the tracking can be a pain in the ass and i think it would be better for roulette, because you don't have to play every spin.


[colorsb]
   B
P   
P   
   B
T   T
P   
P   
P   
   B
   B
P   
   B
   B
P   
P   
P   
   B
   B
P     BBP
   B
P   
   B BPB
   B
   B
P     BBP
   B
   B
   B BBB bet selection
   B
   B
   B
P   
   B
P   
P   
P   
   B
T   T
   B
   B
P   
   B
P   
   B
P   
   B
   B
   B
P   
P   
P              PPP   
P   
   B
   B PBB
P   
P   
   B PPB
P   
P   
   B PPB bet selection
   B
[/colorsb]

[lucky_strike]

Here is the result for the first random bet selection above...

BBPBPBBBPBBB
BBBPBPPPBBBP
ssooooooosso

Playing with the flow with reducing bets.

WL WW WW WL

Playing against the flow with reducing bets.

LW LL LL LW

And you can see it like this that they wont get to become 3 series of 6 in a row as an mirror images with an momentum or 4 series of 6 in a row as an mirror images with an momentum that you can play with or against with reducing bets or skip that and play them all with an momentum.
Cheers LS

[JLP]

Here is the result for the first random bet selection above...

BBPBPBBBPBBB
BBBPBPPPBBBP
ssooooooosso

Playing with the flow with reducing bets.

WL WW WW WL

Playing against the flow with reducing bets.

LW LL LL LW

And you can see it like this that they wont get to become 3 series of 6 in a row as an mirror images with an momentum or 4 series of 6 in a row as an mirror images with an momentum that you can play with or against with reducing bets or skip that and play them all with an momentum.
Cheers LS

Hi Lucky,

Yes, now is understandable mate.
But what I don´t understand is which of the 2 options we select : play with the flow or against the flow.
You select this in random form??
I think is always better to play with the flow.Also you see it in the example : playing against the flow ---->many loses, although we not play in all the hands.

Cheers,
JLP.-

[lucky_strike]

But what I don´t understand is which of the 2 options we select : play with the flow or against the flow.
You select this in random form??

Yes its fun and strange that same looks like it has some kind of favor.
But it should not be a differens, but i looks like it is.
So if the 3 or 4 indications for the static rule is about the same, then its maybe better to follow that flow when you place your bets.
I don't know its just an idea for any one to explore.
Tendency or not, ho knows...

Cheers LS

[JLP]

Yes its fun and strange that same looks like it has some kind of favor.
But it should not be a differens, but i looks like it is.
So if the 3 or 4 indications for the static rule is about the same, then its maybe better to follow that flow when you place your bets.I don't know its just an idea for any one to explore.
Tendency or not, ho knows...

Cheers LS

Hi Lucky,

I marked in red in the quote.
Yes, that what you say is an indicator of the tendency.
Agree 100%, although the shoe can go to the other way in few hands.

Cheers,
JLP

[lucky_strike]

What would be interesting would be a lightning-conductor that really works.
Win or lose against the static lotteri or the lotteri with an random element.

Well i would use and bet selection with an random element to find an momentum that change over time to get an lightning-conductor for educated guess work and reducing bets with one static rule.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

-