Unique 4 Repeater System

[babs]

0 --- this spin was 9
   0 --- this spin was 34
   0 --- this spin was 33
   0 --- this spin was 9
   0 --- this spin was 2
   0 --- this spin was 22
   0 --- this spin was 14
   0 --- this spin was 29
   0 --- this spin was 18
   0 --- this spin was 15
Betted on 22,14,18,15,0
   7 --- this spin was 27
  14 --- this spin was 10


-----------------------------------------

The amount won/lost on this competition was --- 14

The number of spins on this competition was --- 12

I ignored 9 since it repeated. Did you notice that when you hit a number you also only get 7 units.

[RPro75]

I think you should re-track since the whole focus of this system is to hit repeats. If you already hit one repeat before starting you are narrowing your chances. Another possibility: instead of re-tracking from the start use the first 4 unique numbers (that did not repeat) in a group.

I will test this system on Roulette Ride 1.2 also

You mean after a hit instead of starting the re-track process over you re-trace your existing spins and pull the last 4 unique numbers from a dozen that spun in?
That sounds like it might work.  Could you explain your method when you get a repeater while you are tracking?  Waht do you think is the best way to approach that?

[RPro75]

0 --- this spin was 24
   0 --- this spin was 18
   0 --- this spin was 8
   0 --- this spin was 26
   0 --- this spin was 24
   0 --- this spin was 7
   0 --- this spin was 20
   0 --- this spin was 8
   0 --- this spin was 1
   0 --- this spin was 15
   0 --- this spin was 13
Betted Here: 0, 13, 15, 28, 20 (I ignored any numbers that repeated)
   7 --- this spin was 34
  14 --- this spin was 12
-15 --- this spin was 0 Should have won (for some reason the program did not made this a win.)


-----------------------------------------

The amount won/lost on this competition was --- -15

The number of spins on this competition was --- 14

After 14 spins it would have been a profit. Not sure how much

I noticed you bet 4 unique numbers from different dozens here.  Did you mean to do this?

[babs]

You mean after a hit instead of starting the re-track process over you re-trace your existing spins and pull the last 4 unique numbers from a dozen that spun in?

Yes.

I thought of something else and I have tried it already, but only once. Busy with the second try now. Spin once. The first number you hit is the dozen to play numbers in.  Ex. First spin 1. Place 1 bet on 1 and 12 on the 2nd and 3rd Dozen. Keep spinning. Every number you hit in the first dozen gets one chip. Keep playing until you get a repeat hit in the first dozen, or your total bet amount is bigger than 35.

Hope you understand. Will post my results ASAP

[babs]

I noticed you bet 4 unique numbers from different dozens here.  Did you mean to do this?

Whoops. Sorry. I made a mistake. Not sure what I did.

Here is the results from my new idea.

   0 --- this spin was 1
I betted on 1 and 12 units on both the 2nd and 3rd Dozens.
  11 --- this spin was 16
  22 --- this spin was 36
  33 --- this spin was 21
  44 --- this spin was 29
  19 --- this spin was 5
Betted on 1 and 5 and 12 units on both the 2nd and 3rd
  -7 --- this spin was 6
Betted on 1, 5 and 6 and 12 units on both the 2nd and 3rd
   2 --- this spin was 31
  11 --- this spin was 5 First repeat in 1st Dozen - Stop


-----------------------------------------

The amount won/lost on this competition was --- 11

The number of spins on this competition was --- 9

[babs]

Ok this one was bad, but I tried a few things

   0 --- this spin was 15 > First spin so I bet on 15 and other dozens.
-25 --- this spin was 16 > bet on 15 and 16 + Dozens
-51 --- this spin was 20 > bet on 15,16 and 20 +Dozens
-78 --- this spin was 0 > Bet 15, 16, 20, 0 + Dozens
-70 --- this spin was 7 > Good a win
-62 --- this spin was 26 > Another win
-90 --- this spin was 21 > Loss - Bet on 15, 16, 20, 0, 21 + Dozens
-85 --- this spin was 2 > A win
-125 --- this spin was 24 > Increase betsize (2 on numbers 15 on dozens - do not know why) bet on 15, 16, 20, 0, 21 and 24 + Dozens
-122 --- this spin was 32 Slight win
-92 --- this spin was 24 First repeat - Stop with loss.


-----------------------------------------

The amount won/lost on this competition was --- -92

The number of spins on this competition was --- 11

[RPro75]

Ok this one was bad, but I tried a few things

   0 --- this spin was 15 > First spin so I bet on 15 and other dozens.
-25 --- this spin was 16 > bet on 15 and 16 + Dozens
-51 --- this spin was 20 > bet on 15,16 and 20 +Dozens
-78 --- this spin was 0 > Bet 15, 16, 20, 0 + Dozens
-70 --- this spin was 7 > Good a win
-62 --- this spin was 26 > Another win
-90 --- this spin was 21 > Loss - Bet on 15, 16, 20, 0, 21 + Dozens
-85 --- this spin was 2 > A win
-125 --- this spin was 24 > Increase betsize (2 on numbers 15 on dozens - do not know why) bet on 15, 16, 20, 0, 21 and 24 + Dozens
-122 --- this spin was 32 Slight win
-92 --- this spin was 24 First repeat - Stop with loss.


-----------------------------------------

The amount won/lost on this competition was --- -92

The number of spins on this competition was --- 11

Also, if you had been betting the zero, you would have had a hit on spin 4.  Very interesting.  Please keep testing, so far it isn't magnificent, but it's shaping up.

[RPro75]

I tried this on my favorite auto roulette machine at Indian Bend casino and fared pretty well.  It was somewhat of a grind, but it did produce profit.  I started off with 3 wins, then experienced a loss, 2 more wins, a loss, and then 2 wins (with several dozen hits in between) to finish.  Total profit was 101 units ($25.25) in 108 spins.  I am pretty happy with it the way it is but can't help feeling that I am missing something that can make this work better.  Any ideas?

[RPro75]

I decided to  change the 4 bet sequence up a little bet to the following:

Bet 1:  Numbers= 1 unit /Dozens= 10 units (25 units total bet)
Bet 2:  Numbers= 2 units/Dozens= 15 units (40 units)
Bet 3:  Numbers= 3 units/Dozens= 20 units (55 units)
Bet 4:  Numbers= 4 units/Dozens= 30 units (80 units)

If you were to lose all 4 bets one right after the other you would lose 200 units.  Usually, you will at least hit dozens bets in between to minimize your loss.  I think the beginning bankroll should be 400 units for this system.  I have been having a little better recovery rate with this betting sequence.

[RPro75]

Ok, I think I am almost there as far as figuring out if this system is any good or not.  I decided to play it for 300 spins flat betting only.  I did this by tracking as usual, but only playing each "game" until I either won or lost.  If I lost, I did not increase bets, simply started a new "game".  If I hit a dozens bet, I kept spinning until I either hit one of my numbers, or lost.  Here are the statistics:

Session: 300 spins from Spielbank Weisbaden
Beginning Bankroll:  400 units
Total games in session: 27
Games Won: 9
Games Lost: 18
Win/Loss Sequence:WWLWLLLLLLLWLLLLWLLLLWLWWWL
Ending Bankroll: 194 units
Profit/Loss (+/-): -206 units
Win%: 33%

     As you can see, I did not do so well with the flat betting half of the experiment.  The second half of the experiment will be to play the same 300 spins, but to increase my bets using the 4 bet sequence as described above.  It is important to note that in 1 of the games, I lost but still posted a profit because I had 8 dozen hits before the loss finally came.  The reality is that if a system cannot win flat betting, it probably can't win with a progression, either.  These results are not typical of the ones I was getting.  However, with only 3 tests prior to this one, I cannot really define "typical" in this case yet.  Maybe it's time to put this one to bed?  What do you all think?

[RPro75]

Well, you have to give me an A+ for effort, but after many more tests it is just not a viable syste.  I am going to put it on the back burner for a while and maybe I'll come up with a nice tweak.  As of right now, it loses much more than it wins.

[RPro75]

-