@victor

[sundayflower]

hello victor,

Where I can found all methodology about LW?
What kind of bankroll is needed to apply it?
Is it possible to play flat betting?
On average how many units per session and how long is a session?
How many spins you test it?

Regards

[admin]

"Where I can found all methodology about LW?"
Sadly, the two forums where I exposed the Lw methodology in full have been wiped/died.  :-/

Lanky is the man to ask about Lw methodology now, since he as improved my original strategy and made it way better. He has been a consistent winner with his tweaks for a year now.

"What kind of bankroll is needed to apply it?"
Suggested: 2000-unit bankroll. Although it is for the full production/recovery combo; Lanky has his 6-point plan which is better as money management than my leftmost cancellation. He said a bad session takes only by the mark of 500 units to overcome, so probably doubling that to 1000 for his tweaks is enough.

"Is it possible to play flat betting?"
No mate, sorry.

"On average how many units per session and how long is a session?"
+50/session and mine are in the range of 150/200 spins to as much as 400+ spins. I do not fear to be in a long session. Of course, if I am at airball roulette I can get almost 1 spin/minute. Lanky also plays airball.

"How many spins you test it?"
I know it is certainly above the 10,000-spin mark when considered all of the sessions together I've made through the years, what I do not know is how many actually placed bets.



My advice is: Study lanky's implementation, do plenty of tests and only when you are certain you can make it work, then give it a few real-money sessions (yes, some people simply can't work with it because of lack of patience to wait for the proper times to bet).

If you are confortable with it, by all means go for real. But if you do not think you can handle being hours and hours at the casino for a reward which can be slim, then the Lw isn't recommended (this certainly isn't a "get rich quick" methodology, heck it even isn't a "get rich" one [smiley=lolk.gif]).

Bear in mind I made it at a time when my main mission was to keep the family out from starvation, so a very slim but consistent cumulative profit is the goal here.
Just a warning for the times when you are behind and think of cursing me for not making it a martingale-like "1 win gets all" happy dude system.  

[sundayflower]

Thank's awfully for your reply my mate

regards

[admin]

Lanky and I always say we are blessed with patience.

We are believers of the rithm roulette has, regardless of who or what is throwing the ball.

Impatience is the most destructive as it makes people make dumb bets, rushed bets, or suicide bets (as in: this is taking too long and patterns do not develop, all to red... and then comes black [smiley=im/confused_smile.gif]).

The very first thing to beat when thinking in becoming a serious gambler is yourself.

Then -once you have yourself under control- know a method's cycles inside out, and go for it champion. Juice the concentration of hits and bet as little as possible in times of dispersion, as in this beautiful Roulette Mnemonic:
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1208463330

That is one of the many paths to take some money consistently at this game... not every session, but at the averages (where really counts).

Best regards to you too.

[Joker]

Hello Mr. victor how are you doing?

I was wondering you could help me how to hunt L's

nolinkswlnolinkslnolinkslwwlll<<<three l's here and can i stawrt betting l's until nolinks shows up?

are there any signal i should start betting on L's?

thank you so much

Joker

[admin]

nolinkswlnolinkslnolinkslwwlll<<<three l's here and can i stawrt betting l's until nolinks shows up?

Yes, this is the maximum concentration of L's, so better to bet for the continuation, precicely suggested till nolinks, because that is the concentration of w's and index the L's skipped a cycle. So yes, you are right.

are there any signal I should start betting on L's?

Well, more than 2 L's in a 3-spin cycle (dozens) indexes concentration of L's. This is called situational play because you speculate depending on what you are experiencing at the time.

Of course, if there is nolinks after you enter, stop. L's are tricky to bet continually, but they can be a big ally for recovering quicker than with w's.

My advice is to start betting on the L's preferably when there has been a strong imbalance in favor of the w's and L's start to show.

[Joker]

Hello Mr. Victor thank you so much

so to make sure that

WWWLWLWLLL<<<soon as this happen then should i start L's?

or if WWWLWLWLLLWWLWLWLWLLL<<then start betting?

thank you very much for your help and it is cute Joker picture

joker

[admin]

My advice is to start betting on the L's preferably when there has been a strong imbalance in favor of the w's and L's start to show.

I ment like this dear Joker:
nolinksnolinksnolinksLnolinksnolinksLnolinksnolinksnolinksnolinks[highlight]LwL[/highlight] => Now, because there has been many w's and two L's in a 3-spin cycle represent a concentration, this would be our bet to hunt the L's for three spins, if nolinks, then we stop.

Also LLL is obviously the maximum concentration of L's for a 3-spin cycle. So that is a valid signal too for the L hunting.

Remember joker, it all depends on the situation and the actual unit-target at the time you are betting. We simply try to position ourselves at the most likely times for the hits to show in the timeline, shall roulette continue to perform like usually does.

[admin]

-