Betting Dozens to Pattern

[hammy]

Here is a system for testing, I'm sure this is not new but not sure if it has ever been posted here ?

Start by betting 1 unit on dozen 2 & 3, then 1 unit on doz.1 & 3, then 1 unit on doz. 1 & 2., repeat pattern 2-3, 1-3, 1-2.
If a bet loses, then you triple up on next bet, if that wins go back to 1 unit on next bet. If you lose the triple bet, you quit that session.
Set a profit target, I suggest 10 wins then quit that session with a 10 unit profit. Any losing session will be no more than an 8 unit loss.

good luck,

hammy ..

[wiggy]

I like tracking the dozens... they are most unpredictable... your method plays 24 numbers for two spins before you tank a session. It is easily conceivable that you will get caught out playing this way...
Perhaps "track" the pattern you suggest and when you track 1 or 2 losses then place your bet with a triple up as a backup also.

But I don't like betting on 2 dozens... it won't last with constant betting.

[ADulay]

    If you would like to catch all the runs on the dozens, why not try betting the last two dozens that showed instead of the ones you have now?

    We've all seen the multiple runs on a single column and adding to that wager the last column that hit before that streak would help it a lot.

    Basically bet the last two winning columns that showed.

    AD

 

[rjeaton1]

You can download the RXtreme code for this system here: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/downloads/?sa=view;id=420

Enjoy!

[hammy]

ADulay,

Betting the last 2 dozens doesn't win , long term, we have all tried that.
I don't like tracking spins forever, then betting every 10 spins maybe.
This pattern seems to hit alot with one progression bet on a loss, it has to lose twice in a row to lose.
Keep the sessions short, like 8-10 hits, then quit.

[ADulay]

I didn't say it was a good system, just a bit better than betting on a set pattern.

I have sat there and flat bet the chase for quite some time with minimal damage while waiting for the wife to finish whatever the heck it is they do on the slot machines for so long.

What caught my attention was just how long an individual column could go without showing!!   I've personally seen several runs of 17 and 18 spins with no center column or no third column.   Just thought it weird but as long as the other two were producing, I didn't care at the time.   It was just odd not to have to change the bet for such a long time!

AD (more of a baccarat man myself but I dabble in roulette)

[hammy]

This system is not for columns !
I do not bet on columns, they perform much differently than dozens.
For some reason the pattern of 2-3, 1-3, 1-2, hits alot and doesn't lose back to back often.
You can make a quick hit and run profit and quit, especially online with RGN.

[zwanatico]

It seems a really easy & interesting system
I think it is important to use winprofit and stop losses
But is it profitable?
Anyone checked online rng casinos?

[ADulay]

 I've got some free time tonight.

I'll run a few hundred spins at RaceBook, just for grins, to see how it comes out.

AD

[Spike]

I do not bet on columns, they perform much differently than dozens.>>>

In what way? The coulumns and dozens are all made up of 12 numbers and the outcomes are all random and have nothing to do with the table layout, how could they perform differently? I used both for a long period and I didn't see a whit of difference. There can be no difference, its a mathematical impossibility.

[Mr J]

Very true Spike, a no brainer. Its like saying the 0 hits more than the 23.  Ken

[Spike]

I'm very interested in how Hammy came to the conclusion that they perform 'differently'.

Hammy, do you have examples?

[hammy]

I'm very interested in how Hammy came to the conclusion that they perform 'differently'.

Hammy, do you have examples?

Ok Spike, so you and Mr J say columns and dozens are the same ...then I guess they must be ?...

examples !!  .. are you kidding ?  I will let you both figure it out ...

cheers !

[Spike]

examples !!  .. are you kidding ?  I will let you both figure it out ...>>>

Figure out what? I you think there is ANY difference whatsoever in the random outcomes that make up the dozens and random outcomes that make up the columns, you know nothing about how random works.

You can't give any examples of differences because there aren't any. This is why there are so many crappy systems out there, the people making them up have inadequate knowledge of how the game works.

[rjeaton1]

Hammy, I'm not going to attack you, or even just say "The columns behave differently" and then offer you no proof.

I used to hate it when I would post a system and people would say it wouldn't work without anything to show me it wouldn't (unfortunately they were right, but it would have saved me a lot of time if I had either

A: Listened to them and taken their word as the truth without proof

or

B: Had proof given to me that proved it wouldn't work - I.E. Testing results showing its failure points)

Unfortunately, Spike and Mr. J are correct though.  The columns don't behave any differently than the dozens do.  They behave exactly the same.

If you'd like proof, you can either visit this link and download the .DGT file located there: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/reference-area/now-you-can-get-your-own-stats/

Or, I'll reprogram the .DGT file I already provided you on this thread to bet on both the columns and the dozens and keep track of the win/loss rate for both.

I'm not saying this to rub it in your face or anything either Hammy, I'm just trying to save you some time is all.  I figure you'd probably rather waste as little time as possible than continue using an idea that just won't work.

[rjeaton1]

-