Addonai's "Half of the Moon" System Test

[TwoCatSam]

I made a mistake.  Will correct and repost.

[TwoCatSam]

Rules:  Using the splits Addonai furnished, I will look for a winner as soon as three appear.  They must be within seven spins.  The first number can be the first and the last, the last, but no more.  I will use each number to search for a sequence of three.  In my worksheet you will notice I use the second number of a winning sequence to begin hunting another.  Why?  New eyes on the marquee would do this, so why shouldn't I?

First test:

[TwoCatSam]

Test Two, 3/28/08  Riverbelle

There were many bets, seven of which did not win in the first three spins.  The deepest into the progression would have been 8.

The three losers cost 1,260 units.

There were 19 winners within the first three.  These paid 1,750 units.  Profit on the trot was 490 units.

I figured the profit wrong on the first run; it was much higher than six units.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Test results.......all from Riverbelle Live Wheel  Single 0

6/11/8       <50>
4/22/08    1090
4/20/08     80
4/21/08     <590>
6/5/8       700

This is not using a progression; this is flat-betting for three bets and abandoning the series.  I will do the math later. 

This system is a sector-based methodology--pure and simple.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Latest results from Riverbelle Live Single 0 Wheel

4/23/08     180
6/11/8       <50>
4/22/08    1090
4/20/08     80
4/21/08     <590>
6/5/8       700
6/19/8      <90>

The trot so far.  I am betting 10u on each split.  I am ahead 1320u on the testing so far.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Latest results from Riverbelle Live Single 0 Wheel

4/23/08     180
6/11/8       <50>
4/22/08    1090
4/20/08     80
4/21/08     <590>
6/5/8       700
6/19/8      <90>
6/19/8(2)  <60>

Thinking about applying Gamlet's "Ice" to this sector. 

Sam

[bloomone2002]

Latest results from Riverbelle Live Single 0 Wheel

4/23/08     180
6/11/8       <50>
4/22/08    1090
4/20/08     80
4/21/08     <590>
6/5/8       700
6/19/8      <90>
6/19/8(2)  <60>

Thinking about applying Gamlet's "Ice" to this sector. 

Sam

Sam, there may be a pattern in your wins vs loses at the best time to play and not to play as to why the 1090 won and the 590, 90 and 60 lose. Just a thought.

[TwoCatSam]

bloome

Yes, there could be.  I wish I could find it, also.

I'm still pretty hot on this system.  I'm building a carport for our mini-RV and I can't test any for a day or so.  Wish it would rain!

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

On my last try I had results so horrendous, I won't post them.  I must abandon this study as it is not for me.

I am mullling a new twist, not new really, it's Gamlet modified by Addonai.

We look for any 12 contiguous pockets that have been hit three times in the last seven spins.  There could be 37 sectors instead of one.  Betting on all sectors as they appear with no progression possibly could reduce volatility as Monte Carlo put it.

During the time of the horrendous "half of the moon" many other "halves of the moon" could have been hitting like a Poppin' Johnny and could have leveled the loss spike down to a reasonable bump.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

-