Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

What is a trend ?

Started by I have cookies, March 16, 2011, 03:59:09 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

schoenpoetser

With very much pleasure I follow the discussion on this thread.I have read many statements I agree.In my manner of playing roulette I recognize the rules I use.A method suitable for real wheels and RNG can only based on maths and a lot of experience.There is much changed through the possibilities of computers. Test of large samples are done in seconds.I do these test from the born of commodor 64.

I test my strategy in practice on an internet RNG and it is very successful.My lifehorizon is not so far and perhaps is that the reason I offer my knowledge and experience.

win1win2

Hi to all

Good day to all my old friends.

Have been reading this very interesting topic for a week and it it getting very active


Gizmotron how r u bro, Thank you
As of today i am still yr fan and often refer to yr tips.

Quote from  Mauisunset

" I'm running a contest for the first person to make just $1 (1 unit)
in a minimum of 100 spins and if you lose you come back and try another 100 spins
and if you still can't make 1 unit profit you get another 100 spins
for a total of 300 spins just to make 1 unit. 
The winner get's $25 in their PayPal account which is the prize
and the title of "I'm a for real Roulette player that makes money". 
If you think the $25 is too small, well hold your own contest and pay some big bucks.
I never asked anyone to say one word about their system -
just play and since we can't see their PC screen to say what their bet was
and the running total......

To say that i did win some money from the casino is no prove.
And also not qualified to participate in your contest.

So now i submit my pre qualification
I have a testing account at Dublinbets online casino

and from 1000  i have reach 40,000.... can give u password for verification.

This is not the first time i raise it to 100k.

As every time i have a new method of beting i test in Dublinbets if i can reach
100000 k then i will use it in B/M casino

As to yr contest i will raise my 40000 to 60k by the end of the month.
or we put it this way u set up an account and raise it to 60k i pay u $50

If i win donate yr $25 to this board dont sent to me.

Thank to all.

WIN1WIN2....bets without fear many winswinswins are here.

schoenpoetser

The law  of balance tell us on the long run the deviation between Red and Black is very small and the ratio R/B is about 1.In small samples the deviation can be very large.R-B will oscillate around zero in small samples ( < 250 spins).I call this feature a trend and I use it in my strategy.I know many of you do not agree.

DonRoul



I noticed you werent sure whether casinos cheat.....its laughable.

The word cheat and casinos should appear in the same place in a thesaurus.

Brick and mortar casinos only survive by cheating.

I have seen it and experienced it.

The only way to beat them is with this clear understanding!

Hope to hear from you!

Don

Duty_Free

Quote from: MauiSunset on March 17, 2011, 08:37:37 AM
I've looked at these "studies" and as an engineer they make no sense to me at all!

Any test needs a datum - a point of reference.  In Roulette it would be an automated Roulette table in a sealed room running constantly for years - 365/7/24 - the ONLY modification would be a sensor that would release the ball at the same point for all the testing.

If there is anything to any of these wild speculations then studying the mechanics hundreds of thousands of spins need to be the reference point.  The landing number must be identical in 95% of the spins.  No datum was ever established to see if any further testing is worthwhile.

Other identical bots should be running with changes to common influences on the table - heat, humidity, contaminants, and of course non level platform.

I see none of this but just the idea that a non-level wheel will be biased - a conclusion in need of a flawed test.

As an engineer, I would not accept any conclusions from these two experiments - they don't use the Scientific Method to prove their hypotheses - they are totally flawed and mean nothing.

These two tests are based on Junk Science and any conclusion is Junk....

The problem with this post and the poster's comments is that he assumes you need to calculate and hit the exact number in order to make money from roulette. What about neighbour bets? Say you can predict where the ball will land to within 15 numbers on the wheel and cover these numbers with 3 neighbours bets (£25 each = £75) you'll be paid £175. That's a £100 profit.

No system can ever predict where the ball will land as there are too many real time variables to consider. It's ludicrous to think otherwise.

Duty_Free

-