Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Finally, a way to test your strategies!

Started by eccl1019, April 22, 2011, 04:50:38 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

eccl1019

Stop wondering if your strategy is a winner.  Test it and see!

At hxxp: testmystrategy. com/, you can test your Roulette strategies all you want, American or European, for completely free.

Test as many spins as you'd like!

See what will happen after 100 spins, or 1,000, or a million!

Not only can you test your strategies for free, but you will even have the chance of winning a prize if you have the best winning test at the end of the month.

$100 monthly grand prize!

2nd and 3rd place prizes as well.

Post a reply and let me know how you enjoy the site.

Admin - TestMyStrategy. com

iggiv

my humble opinion: testing like this doesn't make much sense. no system can beat roulette consistently.

it should be tested as "hit-n-run"

eccl1019

Quote from: iggiv link=topic=18628.  msg135002#msg135002 date=1303497860
my humble opinion: testing like this doesn't make much sense.   no system can beat roulette consistently. 

it should be tested as "hit-n-run"

Thanks for the reply.    Keep in mind, I am not asking for any money here.    This is free for all to try, all you want.    I'm even offering a $100 monthly prize, to any winner, who is only a free member of the site. 

When I first started out playing Roulette at the Casinos, I lost a lot of money, thinking I had a winning system, because I tested it for many spins in practice mode, and every once in a while, one of my strategies would get lucky for a while, which left me thinking it was a winner.    It took me hours to test even 100 spins, which was not enough spins to be a very accurate display of the odds of my strategy.    I would then bet with real money, and get unlucky.    :(

I have the only site on the internet where anyone can input any kind of strategy they want, and see what would happen after 100,000 spins!  And you only have to wait minutes for it to process the results, where as in real life it would take years to test that many. 

It doesn't matter if there is a guaranteed system to win consistently or not, there certainly are some systems that are better than others, and on my site, you can quickly try out a lot of different ideas, and be able to take your best one to the casino. 

Although, I myself have strategies saved in my own free registered account, that win more often than not, for huge spins.    I will never go to the casino and play a million hands, but I have fun seeing if I can beat the odds myself on my own site. 

I hope people will enjoy being able to finally try out ideas they may have had for a long time, or wondered about. 

Please watch my video on YouTube for a better understanding of how complex of strategies can be entered: Roulette Tutorial - How To Test Strategies

Thanks,
eccl1019
Admin - Test My Strategy.  com



iggiv

i did not say anything against U or your site :)

i just don't believe any method will work on a long run for lots of times in a row. Everything will prove useless.

cheese

Why would I test on a site where my system could be stolen?

gizmotron

Okee Dokee Mokee Jokee!

I'm working on the free lesson software for looking into hot numbers. That's where I first discovered randomness. Perhaps this software will do the same for you. I'll have it done soon. I just want to include all the good stuff. This software will not time out. It's totally free.

Here is my latest contraption. This one is free with no timeout conditions.

nolinks://home.earthlink.net/~gizmotron/hotnuminstaller.exe

Use this tool to start discussions and to think about hot numbers the way they work and don't work. There are several features that allow you to experience how numbers act like sleeping and waking up. This is how I learned to think about randomness several decades ago. It was a simulation almost like this.

eccl1019

Quote from: cheese link=topic=18628. msg135030#msg135030 date=1303527429
Why would I test on a site where my system could be stolen?

No need to worry, your ideas cannot be stolen.   Your info is safe.   Your strategies will never be revealed.

The reason why you would want to test them, is because of how quick you can immediately see how well they might do.   It is only for each user to personally experiment with different ideas for strategies.

Mike

Quote from: iggiv on April 22, 2011, 03:44:20 PM
my humble opinion: testing like this doesn't make much sense. no system can beat roulette consistently.

it should be tested as "hit-n-run"

Iggiv, think about it. What you're saying is that no system should be tested over a large number of spins - only a few at a time or results will be invalid. The system doesn't know whether you test it over a lot of short "hit n run" sessions or a long sequence of "continuous" spins. You COULD take a lot of short sequences and add them all together, then test all the short sequences which are now one long sequence - why should the results be any different?

If you can beat roulette by winning one hit n run session after another, isn't that beating roulette consistently? but you deny that it can be done.

It's an illusion generated by wishful thinking. It's simply sticking your head in the sand and refusing to face reality.

iggiv

Quote from: Mike on April 23, 2011, 02:40:06 AM
Iggiv, think about it. What you're saying is that no system should be tested over a large number of spins - only a few at a time or results will be invalid. The system doesn't know whether you test it over a lot of short "hit n run" sessions or a long sequence of "continuous" spins. You COULD take a lot of short sequences and add them all together, then test all the short sequences which are now one long sequence - why should the results be any different?

If you can beat roulette by winning one hit n run session after another, isn't that beating roulette consistently? but you deny that it can be done.

It's an illusion generated by wishful thinking. It's simply sticking your head in the sand and refusing to face reality.




i wrote a long answer, then decided to cut it short. if u have a method, winning on a long run --go to
wizardofodds.com, claim your 20k (something nobody was able to do so far), if not -- then why this empty useless talk about someone refusing "to face reality". If u have some good concrete ideas how to defeat roulette, share them with us please, if not -- then there is nothing to talk about. Just cool words to make u look cool.  :)

i don't mind -- maybe u r cool and i am not

cheese

Quote from: Mike on April 23, 2011, 02:40:06 AM
The system doesn't know whether you test it over a lot of short "hit n run" sessions or a long sequence of "continuous" spins.


All short term or hit and run shows you is that you can get lucky sometimes and win a lot of sessions. But this evens out quickly, so its useless.

Mike

Quote from: iggiv on April 23, 2011, 12:59:35 PM
If u have some good concrete ideas how to defeat roulette, share them with us please, if not -- then there is nothing to talk about. Just cool words to make u look cool.  :)

Isn't there any value in pointing out contradictions and errors as I see them? If you think I'm wrong then give reasons or back up your claims with data. IMO a forum is a place for debate and discussion, I've already shared my views on how to win at roulette but I'm not going to go into step-by-step detail on a public forum.


Mr J

.......but the poster is not obligated to say a word, correct?


Ken

Mike

Naturally Ken.  :)

The point I was trying to make to iggiv was that I don't see any difference between "long run" testing and "hit 'n' run" testing, but he seemed to be saying there IS a difference and many members seem to share that belief.

Mr J

I did a thread on that before. I am 50/50 on the subject. I truely do see both sides of the views.

Ken

eccl1019

Quote from: Mr J link=topic=18628. msg135623#msg135623 date=1304526431
. . . . . . . but the poster is not obligated to say a word, correct?


Ken

the poster. . .  are you referring to me?

I am enjoying considering all of your thoughts.

Although I do have opinions of my own, if you're interested.   :)

eccl1019

-