Kingspins Winstrike 4 ( fantastic)

[jrhelp007]

Why be afraid of one or two zeros? Why to hit always the wall with the forehead? It must be a painful experience.
Those really smart one bring it on higher level: on Baccarat bet B/P, on Craps bet Pass/Don't Pass, on SicBo bet small/big. No zero effect on those! We have to think like energy does in the nature: choose always the smallest possible resistance and the shortest way from the point A to the point B. Energy knows all the shortcuts!
I won twice with Bermuda Triangle Baccarat game on DublinBet online casino.
Cheers Hermes

Hermes, you're missing the point.

If I'm betting $100 high or low based on Kingspin's system. When I'm using the progression of 1, 2, 4 I'll not risk $400 to be taken out by 0 and be down $700. So I place $12 of the zero for that spin. There is nothing wrong to place a $12 dollar on zero.

John

[bakonlin]

My opinion is if I bet Low my enemy is High. If 0 comes I will take it as High.I lose not only because of 0.
I never bet 0.

[Kingspin]

Cloth dogs idea should not be discounted or tossed aside , actually it should in theory hold up pretty much the same as winstrike 4. The only difference is we are playing three 6 number groups  which is of course 18 numbers using double streets in place of high low.  I will try this out later this week and play for real money and report back if  I lost or won a bucket full of money.  

[Clothdog]

Whoa John, slow down there mustang! A little testy perhaps?   You'd think I just slandered this post.    Thanks King    Good luck with it!  You're right. I'm not interjecting any other system. John is way off the mark.   I'm just using a different 18 number set and in NO way do I discuss Ronjo's method of using those numbers in his sytem. BTW, I could take any 18 numbers and apply the same principle.
cd

[Kingspin]

Loveya is begging for money off me now 

Time to say good bye guys...

[bakonlin]

So that is loveya intention?

[bakonlin]

I noted that 3205 viewed this thread.Thats great.I also always search this thread when I open the site.
So far I am still making profit.As I used to be the R/B player,during the tracking 9 spins I bet R or B ,many time double my profit,several time my bank roll was wiped out.
My conclusion is ,Kingspin system never wiped out my bank roll because it is buffered by the 9 spin,after the 9 spin the table behaved better.
Whilst the R/B with martingale no stop,must always double up when lose,that killed.
This also answer to loveya who asked me how I won using Kingspin system.
Bravo Kingspin!

[hermes]

Betting on zero is the same stupid insurance as betting insurance on BJ. Ask professionals if they bet insurance on BJ?
Zero is just one missed spin. When you bet red and next spin black comes it is the same loss like when would zero come, isn't it? But zero doesn't come so often as black! Rather bet insurance on black comes more often. Ha, ha, ha...
If you bet progression and are high with bet and zero didn't come for 20 spins bet the insurance but not each spin.
Zero should come once in 37 spins, black 18 times. I know zero comes more often than the probability but we can do nothing about it.
2 days ago at SmartLiveCasino on roulette every 10th spin came zero! I email them and gave them a shit. They just apologized that it doesn't happens often that frequent zero appearance!? BS.
Hermes

[bigtim08]

Kingspin you are winning with this system.   You said you use a 1, 3, 7 progression,  do you just stop at 1,3,7 and start a new game with the same progression or something different?

[Kingspin]

Level 1 can be played 1 3 7 slightly dangerous this but good if you get a good streak of wins..
I will play 1 3 7 and if I lose level 1 then I simply double the chips.

So if I was playing with say £1 chips at level 1 then get unlucky and lose then "level 2" I will play with £2 chips at a progression of 1 3 7.  This is safer than a straight progression follow through which results in massive amounts at risk on bad games.  Martingale scares me.  I tried 1 2 4  BUT to be honest I am greedy and like the 1 3 7.

Hermes can advise really good on these type of bets and which is best for this system as many progressions could work.  Which ever progression any one plays with this system I found it to be a real grind but still a very good bet if you have a lot of patience.  I played this with £100 chips and won a bundle but now I play smaller chips at £20 per chip.  I tested this on real play with £1 chips but you win peanuts for long hours playing..

[I have cookies]

I noticed that no one responded to I have Cookies.  Is it because of the obtuseness of his posts, or do you guys disagree with his ideas?

Sam

Well my opinion is that my post based upon same principals the year 2008 "the original" is much better.

Cheers

[GamblerII]

Hi kingpin

have have tried this system and loss a couple of times so i changed it to to betting that the three letter pattern would repeat, and this showed some profit

can u explain to me if this is good or destroys your system altogether

[GamblerII]

oh and wat casino do you play to get 25p

[bigtim08]

This method of play looked so good to me I did quite a bit of testing with my 10000 spins book and it looked really good.
DAM THE LUCK.  First time i play it for real I lost the first 3 bets so several spins later I play at double the money lose 3 more times at that level.   Then once again I try it and lose 3 in a row again.
One thing that I noticed in testing and it happen to me on 2 of the sets of bets, seems like a lot of the losses come when there are 3 like outcomes.   1st 2nd 3rd spin H H H or L L L.   Did anyone else notice this in there testing or play?

[I have cookies]

This method of play looked so good to me I did quite a bit of testing with my 10000 spins book and it looked really good.
DAM THE LUCK.  First time I play it for real I lost the first 3 bets so several spins later I play at double the money lose 3 more times at that level.   Then once again I try it and lose 3 in a row again.
One thing that I noticed in testing and it happen to me on 2 of the sets of bets, seems like a lot of the losses come when there are 3 like outcomes.   1st 2nd 3rd spin H H H or L L L.   Did anyone else notice this in there testing or play?

Well I understand where you coming from - the first crucial misstake using "Pattern4" is that you increase you bets.
The second misstake is that you should not play once against one formation.
The third misstake is the random variable is all wrong.

My opinion.

[I have cookies]

-