Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Win and Lose Progression

Started by picsous, October 14, 2013, 08:04:12 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

picsous

Hello

As you know , playing d'Alembert and inverted d'Alembert does not work ; adding +1 when losing or +1 when winning doe not work as a long time winner.
I have created a new strategy which is based on Ws and Ls :
First of all I start with 1 unit. If I have already won earlier, I can start with 2 units.
So , my strategy is like this:
if you lose twice , you remove 1   from your last bet  (that is for instance , if you had bet 5 , now you bet 4 because you remove 1)
if you win twice , you stay with the same bet as long as you win
if you lose and then you win , you add 1 to your bet
if you win and then you lose , you also add 1 to your bet

for instance , I play the last color
let's imagine this sequence:  RBBBRRRBRRRRBB ,
since R has come out , I play R and I start with one unit , I lose , then I play B , I win this one , I play again B adding +1 , and I win +2 and so on....
so my bets are like this:
RBBBRRRBRRRRB = 13  spins to be played like this (last color)
LWWLWWLLWWWLW  = 8 spins won and 5 spins lost
-1+1+2-2+3+4-4-5+4+5+5-5+6  = +13      is the progression to be played adding or removing , depending on the last 2 spins
my strategy is starting again from 1 unit (or 2 if you're already a winner) when my bets make me a winner during  the sequence I play
for instance , -1+1+2 make me a winner because -1+1+2 = 2     this is simple ! So , after my third bet (+2) I should stop and start afresh from 1 ; however you can keep on the sequence to win more.
so let's divide the 13 spins sequence:
-1+1+2   STOP  , 2 units won , I start with 1 unit for the next spin:
-1+2 (because +- you add 1+1) STOP , 1 unit won so I start with 1 unit for the next spin:
+1-1-2+1+2 STOP , 1 unit won , I start again with 1 unit:
+1-1+1 STOP , 1 unit won
that makes 5 units won if you start from scratch after a winning sequence
As to the bet selection , it can be anything , last spin or penultimate spin and so on..





picsous


Is this good or no good progression ?
Any questions or remarks ?

bacclover

interesting prog, I think that george (GLC) should take his hat off! hahahah
anyway I give it a try and found it efficient, just one thing, when you are facing a recovery phase and are managing high bets, you should bet a value that allow you to close the drawdown, not more.

One more thing, i am a fan of 1/2 bets, because the ladder is more equilibrated so the scheme could be:

LL > -1 (including a 0 bet after 2 1s lost)
LW > +0.5
WL > +0.5
WW >  =   (or pushing a 0.5 unit)

great work!

bacclover

after more testing:
I have some doubts in increasing the bets after a LW.
a long LWLWLWLWLWLW sequence bring s you high bets but with low gain as you are betting something like -4/5/-6/7 etc.   high risks and low reward
??? better decrease half bet on LW ??? (or 1 bet if you like)

bacclover

-