Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Hammy's "Single Street" System AKA S-Cubed

Started by MattyMattz, September 15, 2008, 08:35:58 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

MattyMattz

Okay, first test (system is posted here: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/full-systems/my-single-street-system/msg21236/#new )

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
[/table]

So I bet 9 times, each time having 3 seperate progressions.  My one loss came on the 3rd progression (betting 3 streets).

Matt

MattyMattz

Second test wasn't as good:

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
2,305,108,-481,-362,42,4
[/table]

4 losses in one session, with this progression, will obviously hurt.  2 of the losses were on step 3, while step 1 and 2 had a loss each.  I'm considering testing using only the first 2 steps... but I'll do more testing according to hammy's rules first, to give it a proper testing.

Until tomorrow,
Matt

MattyMattz

Quote from: mattymattz on September 15, 2008, 09:03:36 PM
Second test wasn't as good:

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,wins,losses
1,183,227,-166,122,26,1
2,305,108,-481,-362,42,4
[/table]

4 losses in one session, with this progression, will obviously hurt.  2 of the losses were on step 3, while step 1 and 2 had a loss each.  I'm considering testing using only the first 2 steps... but I'll do more testing according to hammy's rules first, to give it a proper testing.

Until tomorrow,
Matt


Quick note to point out... had a played the second session with only 2 steps, my high would have been 111 (3 units higher) and my low would have been -217 (264 units better)... interesting.  Also the first session wouldn't have lost, although my high would have been slightly lower.

Cheers,
Matt

MattyMattz

Hey, another test this morning,
results, again, weren't good. 

[table=,]
session,spins,high,low,end,losses
3,500,127,-778,-581,6
[/table]

1st step lost twice, 2nd step lost once and 3rd step lost 3 times.  Also - when playing only the first and second step, low was -444 (334 units better) and end was -179.  High was +64.  There may be an opportunity to play this using an Lw registry, but I would still drop the 3rd step.  I did see 2 losses in a row this session, both were 3rd step losses.

Cheers

cps10

Matt - do you mean 1st step being the 5ss and the 2nd step being 4ss?

MattyMattz

Quote from: cps10 on September 16, 2008, 12:04:47 PM
Matt - do you mean 1st step being the 5ss and the 2nd step being 4ss?

Yep.
I'm looking at lowering the progression a bit.  For example, the first step could be 1,1,2,3,6,10.  Win's would vary from +1 to +7 but the loss would only be -110, campared to -230.... I'll keep you posted.  I'm also thinking of betting 5 streets for a max of 5 spins, then removing my bets and waiting for one to hit, then continue with the progression (betting 4 streets) and using a higher progression... just playing around with ideas.

Matt

cps10

It certainly deserves some looking around for sure.

hammy

Hey guys, I can save you a lot of time testing. This 'system' only works well if you always bet 6 ss every time and only play for 2 hits per session, then start over with tracking a new set of 6 ss. Believe me, I've played this way plenty.

cheers !

hammy

-