Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

A new poll is open, what do you bet ?

Started by Arteinvivo, March 18, 2008, 01:03:42 PM

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Are subjective sys. better than mechanical sys.

Yes they are
14 (42.4%)
No they are not
8 (24.2%)
Either ways, expectation is the same
4 (12.1%)
What is a subjective system ?
2 (6.1%)
What is a mechanical system ?
0 (0%)
I don't care
3 (9.1%)
What the f**k ?
2 (6.1%)

Total Members Voted: 12

JLP

Quote from: Edgardo on May 21, 2008, 09:36:42 PM
Colega, en realidad, tampoco yo entiendo mucho, pero por lo poco que e ido sacando, parece ser un método ganador.

Lo que pasa, es que hablan muy poco de el, en la parte general del foro, las partes mas sustanciosas, las tratan en el Foro Privado.

Un saludo cordial, Edgardo.


Hi Edgardo,

Here is some info about the method Omega 2000 :

==================================================
sur un cycle 56 boules...

2 numéros sortent 4x, en moyenne
3 numéros sortent 5x, 2 cycles sur 3
1 numéro sort 6x et plus, 1 cycle sur 6

L'hypothèse à la base de la méthode est qu'il est davantage concevable pour un joueur de gagner s'il augmente rapidement ses mises après un gain que s'il les augmentent après une perte. Le moyen de gagner consiste donc à attendre les phases positives en se servant d'un indicateur de tendance.

Le jeu se déroule lorsqu'une tendance positive sera confirmée.

6 groupes de 6 numéros sont suivis. La codage ou comptabilisation débute lorsqu'un numéro appartenant à un groupe donné sort.

Le jeu réel débute lorsqu'un groupe de 6 numéros atteint un résultat positif >= +78

=========================================

On a cycle 56 balls...

2 numbers leave 4x, on average
3 numbers leave 5x, 2 cycles out of 3
1 number leaves 6x and more, 1 cycle out of 6

L' assumption at the base of the method is qu' it is more conceivable for a player to gain s' it quickly increases its settings after a profit that s' it increase them after a loss. The means of gaining thus consists in awaiting the positive phases by serving d' an indicator of tendency.
The play proceeds lorsqu' a positive tendency will be confirmed. 6 groups of 6 numbers are followed. Coding or accounting begins lorsqu' a number pertaining to a given group leaves.
The real play begins lorsqu' a group of 6 numbers reaches a > positive test; = +78
======================================

According to this is method based on repeaters and Hot numbers.
Someone knows more about it?

Here is the link to the original thread on French Forum :
nolinks://forum.casinos-jackpots.net/forum-roulette-vt2465.html
Here is the link to the test thread :
nolinks://forum.casinos-jackpots.net/forum-roulette-vt2862.html
=======================================
Another comments :

towards the GES OMEGA V2000 which I believe N is on sale and which gets approximately 30 parts per part of 56 balls; the capital recommended by L author is of 1000 parts but I think that to have a safety maximun especially if one adopts also a plan of capitalization it is to better envisage 2000 parts. on the other hand for L to have lengthily practised I can affirm that I N did not have a loss prolonged of capital with of this fork

J' heard speaks about this method (sixain//pleins/flat bets but nothing more. Can you document us more the forum wishes that, thank you d' advances,

hello, it S well D an attack which declanche on the full sixains and numbers WITH SMALL RISING IN PROFIT; the signal D attacks is done after a blow gaining in fiction. the results are regular and at least one knows how much balls one plays in a part (56). this method is logical because it benefits truly from the law of the third. I do not know if L author still sells it but with the surroundings 3000frs it were worth well this price taking into account the results that J could check AND WHO ARE INFINITELY MORE INTERESTING THAN ALL THESE METHODS CANS THAN L ONE PROPOSES has 2 OR 3000 EUROS; J speaks about it with full knowledge of the facts because since 7ans J very bought and N imports what and this for at least 20.000 euros of methods. I N am not very proud but at least I for it fell on two serious authors... L different being Andre rosard. IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS THAT IF QUELQU ONE WANTS A METHOD I CAN INDICATE SUCH OF L AUTHOR TO HIM BUT IN NO CASE TO SELL OR PHOTOCOPY MINE; THE AUTHORS WHO MADE SERIOUS RESEARCH DESERVE AT LEAST THAT L ONE RESPECTS THEIR WORK;

Cheers,
JLP.-

JLP

-