Any Details on these 2 systems?

[atlantis]

Thanks Caddy. I will try it.


A.

[lucky_strike]

Does anyone have any details or experience on the 31 system

I have been testing some hybrids and tweaks regarding this 31 system.

If there still is any interest to this i can post them.

Cheers Lucky Strike

[bloomone2002]

Yes, LS, I am interested. Please post your tweak on this system.
Thanks
Bloom

[shaineicus]

hi bloom,  thanks for the opportunity for my first post.
 i got a copy of ellisons book, gamble to win last xmas as the sleeve makes some pretty impressive statements like " 7.94% statistical advantage to the player", " breakthrough approach" and "wagering precision". sounds great but then we read that on page 108 mr ellison admits to only using his system 40% of the time he is at the tables. The book also states that it is only suitable for an american double zero wheel and not european but the bet placement he uses are corners (or quads as he calls them) which have no bearing on the placement of numbers on the wheel, so i struggle to figure this out.
  the book is only based on 7500 spins and we all know from rx, a system that one day produces great profits over this amount of spins may and often bomb the next.
Not to take anything away from Mr ellison as his book provides a nice introduction to roulette,progressions,tracking for beginners but in my opinion it was written by a gambler and not someone who plays the game. Im happy to post up all the details if you wish but by being on this site alone you already know more than this system can teach you.

cheers
shaineicus

p.s  many thanks for the site victor, great stuff.

[TwoCatSam]

Re:  R.D. Ellison

I have the book and have studied it thoroughly.  In my opinion it does work well on the single-zero wheel.  Does it work every time?  No....

You are essentially betting a dozen numbers, after waiting for a trigger.  I do not use his guidelines; I crafted my own.

I look at the last five spins.  I must have three of a kind, A or Q numbers before I bet.  My minority cannot be back-to-back, but can be non A or Q numbers.

Example:

1
0
36
15
6

I have three A numbers, 1, 36 and 6, so I wait for my next Q number to trigger a bet on the Q section.  He says just use a majority.

1
14
21
6
2

Will not work as the minority, Q, has back to back hits.

Ellison is smarter than most folks allow and his arguments with the two math professors left him looking a little foolish.  But his point was well taken.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

-