Regression betting on trendsJohn Patrick

Posted 05/16/12

”Let me see if I can bring the Regression BACK to where it belongs....s the greatest (yeah, I said greatest) betting method in the Universe ....for the simple reason is that ONE win wraps up a SERIES Profit as soon as thea first single solitary win is official......

I read your last post and honestly got confused halfway thru it as the moves were totally contrary to what I laid out way way way long ago ....before my hair turned to silver and my Uncle Charlie was unhittable....before I could go from first to third on a grounder to the pitcher (naturally I usually forgot to touch second when there was only a home plate umpire, but that's another story.....)

The Regression was the best.....before the tail (NBA players) wagged the dog.....(Owners of the league....)

Even before gifted athletes played in the NFL for the sport (and of course the money)....and did not get paid to maim their opponents .....and get off with a slap on the wrist....

Even before baseball players were considered major leaguers and considered stars if they hit over .300......popped 40 dingers.....won 18 to 20 games and had completed games of over a dozen.....(or before todays "stars" hit .247.....steal 7 bases, drive in 62 runs .....and can go 2 months before getting arrested for smacking their girlfriend (while Mom is home with the 4 kids .....

Or a pitcher only has to win 9 games......get to the 6th inning 4 times all year.....and hold their ERA under 4.50 and get rewarded with a contract of 135 trillion for 2 years .....

even before the casinos screwed the patrons by dropping the payoff on BJ to 3-2 (soon to be even money)......allowed the dealers to hit soft 17's took away surrender and bumped the minimums to $25 tables ....

Yeah.....the Regression system was "handed" to you people on a gift wrapped platter....to get you to change your idiotic way of betting ....and the method is NOT rocket science ....it is simply LOGIC.....tied with a nice red bow.....

And STILL the math people try and distort the reasoning behind the HOW and the WHY I put it all into a simple little bundle of GENIUS!!!!!!!!!!!!

Before I go over the LOGICAL simple approach of this great "happening"......let me refer you opeople to a great great post (in this very thread)......and all you have to do is go back to the near beginning of the thread and rad the post by James M. Kehl......it was done on 12/11/11 (that's December 11th, 2011 for you math people who have trouble with simple LOGIC....

it was one of the best posts I ever read on the subject and simplicity of grasping a Theory ....and of course James did not receive any acclaim from these so called math wizards ....becaue it was so could ....they could not understand it .....but James enlightened any who wanted to read it ......

So, I will not be able to top his post ....but maybe I can swing even one single solitary person away from the gar bage of those who "refuse to leave the method alone"......because of the very simple statement ......"if it ain't broke....don't fix it"....

Here is the Regression system in all it's GENIUS .....

1) You're at a $10 minimum table ....

2) First bet is $20 (as long as it is higher than the original bet......)

3) You lose the first three hands or 3 out of 4 and you leae that table.....

4) But say you win that initial $20 SERIES bet ......

5) Dealer slides over $20 in chips to you.....

6) You have just reached the totally, absolute NO LOSE SITUATION for that SERIES....you cannot lose any money for that SERIES....impossible!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7) In a space in front of your SESSION money, so as to keep track of the ongoing SERIES, you pull back your original $20 bet and half (in this case $10) of your winning $20...

You have your original $20 back, plus a profit of $10 in that set aside space reserved for that ongoing SERIES....

9) Plus you have $10 in action on the board ....so that IF IF IF you lose the next hand....you are a $10 guaranteed winner for that SERIES....

10) But suppose you WIN that second hand of $10....the dealer slides the winning amount next to your $ 10 bet ......

11) You immediately go to UP and PULL.....you take the $10 and with $5 of it you raise your next bet to $15 ( you UPPED your bet)....and the other $5 of the $10 profit is brought back to your SERIES pile.....

12) At this point you have your $20 starting wager back ....and a profit of $15 for that SERIES....and a $15 wager on board....

13) If you lose you are up $15 for that SERIES....

14) If you win that $15 wager....the dealer slides $15 next to your bet ....and the options are starting now .....

15) You can NOW....raise your next bet to $20 and pull back $10.....OR raise your ongoing wager to $25 and pull back $5.......OR .....pull back the whole $15 profit and bet $15 again.....OR.....pull back the $15 PLUS $5 from your wager of $15 and have $10 going on the next hand.....

You into UP and PULL....but there is a STIPULATION....You HAVE to pull something back to the SEREIES profit pile ....anything you want ....but you HAVE to pull back a profit .....and on the other hand you do NOT have to add to the UP part of the equation....you can bet the same $15 or go down to $10....so it is alright to decrease or increase or stay the same with the wager .....the MUST is mandatory that you get paid for evrey winning hand (your choice...but something!!!

16) For the sake of clarity lets go to the move of UP to $20 and PULL BACK $10.....you are STILL in a no lose situation.....even if you lose that present $20 bet .....

17) But suppose you win that $20 wager ....the optuions again come up.....go UP to $25 and pull back $15.....OR go up to $30 and pull back $10.....or go UP to $35 and pull back $5....or PULL back all $20 profit and bet $20 again.....OR pull back profit plus another $5 and bet $15 .....OR pull back $20 payoff and an additional $10 and bet $10.....

In the case of that REgression move ....you already had your $20 original wager back....plus a profit of $55 for that open SERIES and still a $10 bet in action.....

I could go on all day (is that a song title?

?, also from the past?

?) but hopefully you get the drift ....and as I said it is pure LOGIC....my 7 year old granddaughter got it the first time around ......and is now booking her own game of BJ in her second grade class....(with a 5% payoff to the teacher of course .....well, she's learning)

Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo, what is so hard about this Theory ....or better still ....what is better than it is.......... in its own original version?

?

Outside of the Rocky SERIES and perhaps the Steven Speilberg STAR WARS Epics.....show me one version of spinoffs to SERIES that made it big .......

Which is why I turned grey so quickly (at the age of 33 )....when I see my main contribution to the gambling world be tinkered with.....

Regression after the first win is the key....and it Works to the point I put you in a no lose situation right out of the gate....and then the amount and number of double and triple regressions is up to each individual ......

I USE MULTIPLE REGRESSIONS ....since I hate to lose and love piling up the profits as the STRING of wins roar on.......

I can tell you this......the worst case scenario to anyone who gambles....is to finally catch a nnice streak of winning hands of 5-6-7-8-9 etc .....and without the use of GUARANTEE and EXCESS .....which is UP and PULL in a simpler point of view.....when the streak finally ends.....

and you die as you see the dealer scoop ALL of your winnings back to HIS pile......

Yet a simple application of UP and PULL would ahve left you with a smile on your face ...... "

JOHN PATRICK

http://roncen.websitetoolbox.com/post/regression-betting-on-trends-5616713?highlight=regression+betting+trends[/left]

The Guetting Progressionhttp://www.win-maxx.com/basics/basics03.html